By Nathan Barton
Tradition, indeed, everyday life, is increasingly warped in the 21st Century. This is not incidental or unintended. Many people doing this warping want to twist society to and past the breaking point. They want to completely change everyday life, not merely due to changes in technology and natural changes in how people interact, but purposefully to mold society to fit THEIR philosophy and THEIR ideology: to gain power for themselves, their families and associates, and their descendants. Power over other people, power over society. They do this because their morality (if we dare call it that) is based on false selfishness and a short-sighted mentality that is purely evil.
They use the legal system (no justice found there) and political correctness (warping of public opinion and political pressure) to get their way.
Consider some recent events.
In New York City, Babylon on the Hudson, the US Army has denied congressional Democrats’ demands to rename “Confederate” streets on historic Fort Hamilton. Fox News reports “The U.S. Army denied requests from several New York Democrats to rename streets on the city’s Fort Hamilton military installation. The Bay Ridge, Brooklyn property is a base for the New York Army National Guard and Reserves and was a key U.S. battery during the Revolution and World War II. Fort Hamilton (which sits at the foot of the Verrazano Bridge) combined with Fort Wadsworth on the Staten Island side to serve as a crucial defense of New York Harbor. Rep. Yvette Clarke (D) of Brooklyn was one of several city Democrats who demanded that streets on the base like ‘General Lee Avenue’ and ‘Stonewall Jackson Drive’ be renamed. Clarke joined Nydia Velazquez, Hakeem Jeffries and Jerrold Nadler in sending a letter of protest to the Army over the Confederate names.”
This is not surprising, given the demolition and theft of statues and desecration even of tombstones of CSA dead. I expect it to be quickly followed by efforts in DC itself to rename military installations: Forts Lee and Pickett in Virginia, Fort Hood in Texas, Fort Jackson in South Carolina, and Fort Polk in Louisiana are all named for these and other Confederate generals. Surely political correctness and efforts to permanently change American society (and history and geography) demand it be done quickly.
After that, the PC lackeys of the Tranzis can go after more: did you know that Georgia was named after the evil father of the hideous tyrant King George III? That BOTH North and South Carolina are named after that hideous pair of tyrants, King Charles I and King Charles II. And that Maryland is named (gasp!!!) after the Mother of Jesus? To say nothing of Santa Fe (Holy Faith), Los Angeles (the Angels), St. Augustine (a Catholic saint), Custer City (South Dakota) (a notorious murderer of “Native Americans”) and worse? These MUST be changed.
Mama’s Note: Why just “Confederate” names? Maybe everyone would be happier if each road was numbered consecutively, 1 through however many, going west to east, with all the others being given letters north to south, with additional numbers if there happened to more than 26 of them. All the little offshoot streets and lanes could be composites. Sure would be easier to read a map then. I spent 14 years trying to find street addresses in So. Calif. with a Thomas Guide. Total frustration much of the time. And then, some roads have more than one name… often three! Many places in the southwest also use Indian (or phony Indian) names that nobody can even pronounce. Let’s just simplify the whole thing.
In Maine, Governor LePage has been sued for “censorship” because he blocked comments from some people on his personal Facebook account. As reported by Raw Story, “The Maine chapter of American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is taking Gov. Paul LePage to court for deleting comments and blocking users from his verified Facebook account. A lawsuit filed Tuesday in a federal court in Maine on behalf of two residents (who say they were blocked) is asking the court to deem the action unconstitutional. It sought the Republican governor be stopped from ‘censoring’ Facebook users and the restoration of posting privileges of those blocked. Similar lawsuits were filed on behalf of residents in Kentucky and Maryland, who say they were blocked by their governors on social media, by the ACLU. In a press release Tuesday, the ACLU announced it was filing the lawsuit after the governor did not respond to their request to stop illegally ‘censoring’ constituents on his account, Boston.com reported.”
Note that these people are NOT being blocked from posting anything they want (well, anything future-emperor-to-be Zuckerberg and his lackies at Facebook will allow) on their OWN Facebook accounts – it is just that these governors are not letting them post on the governor’s pages. If I wanted to, I could do the same thing – I could keep the likes of Billie Sutton (Demo running for governor in SD) or John Thune (GOP SD senator) from posting on MY Facebook account. And it would be no more “censorship” than what LePage or others do. But in the weird world of Tranzis and snowflakes, this is a crime.
Which raises two more points. First, notice that the warping of society includes the twisting of definitions of common words. “Censorship” is redefined, just as “rights” are. Second, just because people have the right of free speech does not mean that anyone (even politicians) can be forced to LISTEN to this speech, especially in a situation where it is much like invading their bedroom and sitting there talking to them while they are trying to do something else. (I’m sure that some people will tell me that I’m dead wrong and that politicians (and everyone else) should be FORCED to listen.)
In DC, we find yet another case of what would once have been called an abuse of the legal system. There, Metro has been sued over refusal to run some ads. Again, as reported by Raw Story.
“Washington, D.C.’s [sic- it is a regional system not just the District of Columbia] transit system is being sued over its refusal to feature ads for Milo Yiannopoulos, an abortion provider, and PETA. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Wednesday announced the lawsuit, which asks the court to order the agency to accept and run the ads in its trains and stations and in and on its buses. ‘This case highlights the consequences of the government’s attempt to suppress all controversial speech on public transit property,’ Arthur Spitzer, legal director of the ACLU-DC and lead counsel in the case, said in a statement. ‘The First Amendment protects the speech of everyone from discriminatory government censorship, whether you agree with the message or not,’ he added. Among the ads the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority refused to display was one from women’s healthcare collective Carafem that features a picture of a white pill along with the text ’10-Week-After Pill’ and ‘For abortion up to 10 weeks. $450. Fast. Private.'”
This is a situation of “a pox on both their houses.” First, the government has no business running trains and buses, nor competing with private business and land (and wall) owners for advertising dollars. (The reason they do it is obvious: the income offsets the vast losses government-owned/run mass transportation has every year.) Second, the ACLU plays these kinds of games all the time, when they do not like the cause being advertised. Third, Metro does the same thing: it and its liberal administrators and statist managers are fine with advertising for causes that they support: the war on some drugs, Planned Parenthood, various liberal causes, etc. Fourth, government which favors the prominent (even dominant) political causes naturally will ally itself with those who want no real alternative to business as usual. And, of course, it is government that runs the courts.
The last three examples are just a very few of many. Neither political correctness nor assault by lawyer are in any way protecting society, even if the immediate justification is supposedly to do just that. Nor do they promote liberty.