A couple of weeks back, Ron Paul’s Liberty Report featured this op-ed in the Military Times. Freedom’s Phoenix repostedDr. Paul’s (staff) charges with the headline “DC Swamp calls for a draft.”
Big credit to both Dr. Paul and the Hancocks for finding this. Just a couple of problems and blessings: first, Dr. Paul should know that the Military Times is NOT “Pro-Pentagon” (I understand the folks at Freedom’s Phoenix, not being military, may not realize that.) Military Times is frequently critical of the brass hats at the Pentagon, both civilian and military. The publication still seems to have some remnant of the old press ethics and are neutral or even negative to the DoD and armed services in general. Second, it is not the Military Times that wrote or even encouraged this opinion piece: it is a retired USMC Lieutenant Colonel (O-5) (and former Pentagon denizen) that wrote it. The Times makes that clear.
LTC (R) Plenzler is wrong – very, very wrong. And even if he were right about needing a “limited” conscription, that would only address the symptoms of our military “crisis,” for failure to meet recruiting goals is definitely the responsibility of Congress and the political appointees of Uncle Joe’s mob. Yes, he does place the blame on the FedGov political leadership, but again, symptoms and not causes. Yet he expects political decisions about how to get soldiers, sailors, and airmen to be any good? The problem is far deeper than a draft can solve. His proposal will not work. Not just because it is evil, but because it does not change why people don’t want to serve.
Here is the op-ed:
We Need a Limited Military Draft
29 Jul 2023 Military.com | By Joe Plenzler
The opinions expressed in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Military.com. If you would like to submit your own commentary, please send your article to opinions@military.com for consideration.
It’s time to change how our country fills the ranks of our military.
Since 1775, our nation has used a combination of volunteers and draftees to meet our national defense personnel needs, especially in times of crisis.
Today, the military needs only about 160,000 youth from an eligible population of 30 million to meet its recruitment needs. But after two decades of war — both of which ended unsuccessfully — and low unemployment, many experts believe the all-volunteer force has reached a breaking point. And American confidence in its military is at a low.
The fastest and most effective way to resolve this recruiting crisis is to change how we recruit.
Instead of an “either an all-volunteer force or a fully conscripted force” model, I propose a both-and solution.
We should have our military recruiters sign up new troops for 11 months out of the year, and then have the Selective Service draft the delta between the military’s needs and the total number recruited.
This model would alleviate the incredible pressure on our recruiters, lower the cost of finding new troops, and significantly reduce the much decried civilian-military gap by subjecting all of America’s youth — rich and poor — to the possibility of military service via the draft.
This increased public interest might also have the added effect of increasing public pressure to prevent open-ended wars led by unaccountable senior leaders like we experienced in our national debacles in Iraq and Afghanistan.
While the causes of our current recruiting crisis are many, the fastest and best solution lies within our already existing Selective Service System.
This would obviously represent a seismic change, given the more recent history of military drafts.
In 1973, the draft was abolished with the establishment of the all-volunteer force, driven largely by the American public’s weariness with our debacle in Vietnam; systemic inequities in the draft (e.g. wealthier Americans being able to defer service); and the fact that the size of our population had become so large in relation to the needs of the military, universal drafting became obsolete.
While the all-volunteer force had the effect of lowering discipline problems and professionalizing the force, it also created a vast gap between American citizens and those who serve — effectively creating a military warrior caste that now appears more like a multi-generational family business than an organization that represents the true makeup of our democratic republic.
The establishment of the all-volunteer force also drove the military to expend an incredible amount of resources in terms of manpower and dollars to build a recruiting machine to attract America’s youth to service. Considering it costs about $15,000 to recruit each new member, the overall cost each year exceeds $2 billion.
And recruitment has risen and fallen with the national unemployment rate.
The causes of this crisis are many, and both politicians and our national leadership are largely to blame.
For nearly a decade now, feckless politicians, using the military as a club to batter their opponents, have exacerbated increasing negative public opinion despite the fact that our military has crushed international terrorism and prevented another large-scale attack on our homeland for 22 years and running.
Despite this success, in 2023, every service except the Marine Corps is poised to miss its recruiting goals. In 2022, the Army alone fell short by 15,000 recruits.
The needs of the nation must be met, and our national leadership would be wise to reinforce the idea that military service is an important responsibility of citizenship.
While conscription has always been a controversial issue throughout our history, a hybrid model would alleviate our current military manpower crisis, increase the connectivity between the American public and its military, and more responsibly use taxpayer dollars.
Holes in our military formations are, in fact, gaps in our national security.
— Joe Plenzler is a retired combat decorated Marine lieutenant colonel who served as the strategic advisor for communication to three successive Commandants of the Marine Corps from 2010 to 2015.
Just to make it clear: we here at The Price of Liberty totally reject ANY form of military draft.
I forget where they come from, but paraphrasing,
1) Any society that won’t defend itself voluntarily is probably not worth defending in the first place, and,
2) Any society worth defending is worth defending at a profit.
I think those are both true. If people don’t value the extant society enough to defend it, maybe it’s time to try a different social order. And while it seems a bit mercenary, I think most people above a certain age (and most at or below that age, if we are being honest) would rather pay someone more able than put on the uniform himself. That’s why police exist, right?
So why not just admit what appears to be true — that there doesn’t even appear to be the 160 out of 30,000 that this guy thinks are needed to secure our position as a global hegemon? Maybe we no longer think it’s worthwhile to make the world safe for cans of beer with Dylan Mulvaney’s mug on them, and middle-aged men to jiggle their junk in the faces of preschoolers?
LikeLike
The first is a paraphrase of Robert Heinlein, I think. The second is possibly Col. Alois Hammer, of Hammer’s Slammers in David Drake’s series. Both are based on a keen (if biased) study of human history by the two men. Biased in favor of liberty, I add.
Your conclusion is undoubtedly right. Even the most indoctrinated young man or woman, with a family heritage of military service going back four or five generations, especially from flyover country or the rural areas of blue states, is observant enough to see more and more reasons NOT to join the military services: not even their State’s National Guard. The imperial missions, the Woke training and demands, the abuse of so many people, and more all tend to lend support to your idea.
Bizarrely enough, a series of ads have recently popped up claiming that the military is seeking to recruit seniors (they feat a photo of a weather-beaten woman who appears to be in her 80s) and will pay an enlistment bonus of $50,000! Obviously clickbait and a scam, no doubt, but people seem gullible to accept it because we hear more each day about the “desperate straits” of the military services.
LikeLike