And just what is this really about? Is it intended to distract people from other problems and actions?
In recent days, the entire conversation about Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Idiocy? Alien Intel? Alien Invasion? Awfully Ignorant?) seems to have gone to extremes.
A recent article in ZeroHedge is just one example, and tries (unsuccessfully, in our opinion) to explain the controversy. Paradigm (the libertarian financial firm) describes the current situation as an “AI Freakout” on the part of tens of thousands of people, including many who are generally deemed “trustworthy” and keen observers. Another correspondence of TPOL calls it the “AI Panic.” We know good and generally rational people on both sides of the issue: AI Evil or AI Good.
Among other matters, the AI excitement is tied with the increasing panic over large-scale data centers, which has spread from city to city and State to State with amazing speed. This, in turn, is tied to fears and arguments about the growing surveillance state. Notably, the Flock ™ automatic license plate readers, which are far from the only method being used. Several years ago, Ring ™ cameras and doorbells were a trigger for fears; that seems to have subsided, but is still a real concern. Just not making the headlines anymore.
Continue reading




Thoughts on weapons and disarmament
Now and then, gun owners are accused of being arrogant, stupid, and dangerous. They are even attacked for thinking that they are in the right. We are, in the eyes of many, “laughable” because we (paraphrasing Uncle Joe (Biden)) think that an AR-15 can stand up to an F-15.
Such accusations normally come from people who want the US Constitution to take away the right to keep and bear arms. Just like they do not understand that is one (of many) rights that are not created by the US Constitution, but simply protected by that document, they do not understand other basic facts.
These hoplophobes (gun fearers) and hoploclasts (gun haters) frequently lament, “why do people need weapons of war in their homes?” This is, apparently, supposed to prove both how stupid gunowners are, and how those gunowners do not “properly” understand what that right applies to. Of course, they also usually fail to understand the difference between an AR-15 and an M-16 or M-4, just as they do not understand that a clip is not the same as a magazine.
But what about that question? How can we answer it easily, in nice short words and sentences? Here is one idea of what to say in a way that might convince even a hoploclast:
Continue reading →