A merry Christmas, indeed … and an example of liberty

By Nathan Barton

Fortunately, the Christmas season always brings stories of good things that people do for each other, and here are a couple.

On Sunday the 17th of December, when Atlanta Airport had a massive power outage that shut the place down and left thousands of stranded travelers (apparently thanks to government ineptitude: no surprise, eh?), a highly-vilified group stepped in to help, as reported by KSAT San Antonio.

Chick Fil A, known (and condemned) for its strong stand on not being open for business on Sundays and its opposition to homosexuality and same-sex “marriage,” supplied thousands of chicken sandwiches to feed stranded travelers. The food was given and delivered, at no charge to either the airport, the city (or other government) or the stranded travelers. The company’s owners and employees understand their priorities, voluntarily giving up a day to worship and have family time to help people, even at considerable personal cost.

A second event in Dallas Texas, also involved giving and sharing, despite the condemnation of government. City government in Dallas, Texas, was supposedly responding to public worries and to protect the public safety by making it illegal to feed the homeless in the large Texas city. They passed a law in December 2014 to ban such give-aways. Since the law was passed, police have conducted numerous raids to shut down “illegal” food distribution.

The Free Thought Project reported the results of the latest volunteer effort to provide food (and other items) to the homeless in Dallas without government approval (and, of course, payment of fees and the usual bureaucratic garbage, training, and notices).

This year, the group (delightfully named “Don’t Comply”) decided to do things better. They openly carried sidearms and rifles, including AR-15s, stating in various media and press releases that the carrying of weapons was not to intimidate anyone but to assert and protect their rights and the volunteers helping distribute food, clothing, sleeping bags and other items.

The police observed but did not attempt even once to interfere or demand obedience of the law. A Don’t Comply spokesman stated it plainly: “We are not complying with a bad law today.” TFTP described them accurately as “Good people breaking bad laws.”

To me, they were exhibiting the love God wants us to show to others. That love is not supposed to be limited to Christmas time or any other special event. And there is nothing in the Bible which tells us that obedience to human rulers is EVER to prevent us from doing good, even if the very thing we are doing is “illegal.” Nor can I find any command to jump through government hoops, just to do good for people. (Especially not useing valuable resources to do so.)

(I contrast this to the “Stuff-the-Bus” promotion on Veterans Day, which seems to always have a prominent place for government agencies (including the educrats) and big and influential business.)

By arming themselves and making it clear that they are ready to resist the immoral acts of government AND disobeying immoral laws, let us hail them as an example of self-defense AND a rejection of the pacifism too many claim is essential to following Christ Jesus. Because they were willing to defend themselves, they did not need to. No shots were fired, no police were “resisted” and there was no need to “turn the other cheek.” It is an important lesson to remember.

The “public safety” excuse for such prohibitions is thin and watery. The reality is that government cannot tolerate the competition, and demands to be in control of everything possible. The TFTP article provides other examples (from across the country) of how local government (obviously supported by state and federal government) does all kinds of stupid things which result strangling initiative, personal responsibility, and opportunity for a large majority of people. But especially the poor.

It is more than just bans on feeding the hungry, showing up government for its fraud. It includes licensing and permitting laws and requirements that make it nearly impossible to make a living in any way not approved and recommended by the government – especially if it involves selling anything or providing a service they don’t approve. Government is not just failing to deal with homelessness and poverty, it is a major cause of both.

Indeed, while it is “against the law” to feed the homeless in many places (unless you jump through their hoops and pay for the privilege), more and more jurisdictions are therefore encouraging begging and creating opportunities for theft and illicit sales. While it seems like these local efforts are cutting their nose off to spite their face, they really boil down to more control and enforcing more and more dependence on government.

The faith and works shown by people like Don’t Comply and Chick Fil A is a direct affront to government, while at the same time they are demonstrating love of God and their fellow humans by their actions. It also shows an admirable rejection of institutional ideas; the old “just pay us and we’ll do it for you” attitude that big religion and big charities share with big government (and big business). When it is one-on-one, you can see if that person really needs (and deserves) the help and is not someone gaming the system.

These things are not only suitable for the season, they are showing the evil of government in direct contrast to godly love.

About TPOL Nathan

Follower of Christ Jesus (christian), Pahasapan, Westerner, Lover of Liberty, Free-Market Anarchist, Engineer, Army Officer, Husband, Father, Historian, Writer.
This entry was posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A merry Christmas, indeed … and an example of liberty

  1. tpolnathan says:

    It is a sad commentary on most people in our society (those whom Mama points out desire and are addicted to controlling others) that so many people condemn Chick Fil A (and other like firms) for not being open on Sundays, and/or for not “affirming” (agreeing with and endorsing) their particular views on religion, society, or other matters. And that sadly those people include real pieces of work who sign contracts to franchise that company’s business and then immediately start trying to break that contract and force the company to deny the company’s practices and beliefs.

    Like

  2. Dave Kristopeit says:

    My city of Racine had the first Chick Fil A in Wisconsin. When that first story came out about them being a Christian company a few years ago and boycotts were organized against them, there was a line out the door of our store here in Racine. People came from as far away as Green Bay (150 miles) to show their support for Chick Fil A’s Christian business ethics. It is a great company.

    Like

    • MamaLiberty says:

      That’s great, Dave. We don’t have any kind of “fast food” place here, let alone this one. I have no problems at all with business owners setting any policy or criteria they wish, of course. If there are enough Christians there to support them in this, more power to them. Free association and freedom of choice. That’s the key.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s