Really? What moves where?

By Nathan Barton

Following the 2018 general elections, the LP headquarters sent out this missive:

Libertarian candidates move Republicans and Democrats in a Libertarian direction

“Opposition in an election affects far more than just vote totals. Candidates react to each other and their messaging changes to capture voter interest. Over and over, electoral races that include a strong Libertarian campaign have proven to move the rhetoric of both Democratic and Republican candidates in a more Libertarian direction. As Republicans worry that a Libertarian candidate will siphon away fiscally responsible votes, Democrats also worry that a Libertarian candidate will attract socially tolerant and accepting votes. Both sides tend to claim that Libertarians are ‘spoilers,’ especially when their vote total exceeds the margin of difference between the others. ‘Do I intend to spoil the election for them?’ asked Lucy Brenton, the Libertarian Party candidate for U.S. Senate from Indiana. ‘Absolutely, and here’s why: something doesn’t spoil unless it’s rotten.’”

While I certain agree with Lucy, can I agree with the LP “staff” on this?

Definitely not.  Certainly not the headline, for the press release itself explains the reason.

The presence of a “strong Libertarian campaign” “move[s] the rehetoric of both Dem.. and Rep… candidates in a more Libertarian direction.”

The candidates play lip service to libertarian principles IN THEIR CAMPAIGN.  They don’t actually DO anything to address issues in a way that promotes freedom, except by accident. And I have no doubt that this year will be no different than past years.  The winning candidates that take office will NOT in any meaningful way take principled positions and actions which support restoration of liberty, and more freedom.

Indeed, those who came closest to losing because a Libertarian candidate “spoiled” the election will double down on ways to neuter the LP (and any other parties except the two old ones).

In other words, the more effect a Libertarian or Constitutional or Natural Law candidate has on an election race, the greater the negative impact on the potential to actually elect such a candidate to office in the future.  Especially in today’s climate.  When the two old parties are constantly ramping up their rhetoric against each other, becoming less civil by the day, they want to clear the potential battlefield of anyone they can.  And if you are not with them, then you are against them. Whatever the issue, whomever the candidate.

Does this mean we lovers of liberty need to get out of electoral politics?  It is a difficult decision, but I am more and more convinced.  The answer is yes.  We need to stop squandering precious hours and dollars on running races that cannot be won and which actually harm the cause of liberty more.

We need to put that time and effort into reaching people one on one and teaching them, and learning with them, to be free.  To isolate NOT lovers of liberty, but lovers of government and control.

Hearts and minds, souls and bodies, are not won by laboriously gathering petition signatures and then fighting to get into debates and fori to advocate libertarian positions. They are won by discussing, with both reason AND emotion, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness one on one and in small groups around a living room or a McDonalds’ table.

About TPOL Nathan

Follower of Christ Jesus (a christian), Pahasapan (resident of the Black Hills), Westerner, Lover of Liberty, Free-Market Anarchist, Engineer, Army Officer, Husband, Father, Historian, Writer, Evangelist. Successor to Lady Susan (Mama Liberty) at TPOL.
This entry was posted in Nathan's Rants and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Really? What moves where?

  1. beau says:

    the LIBERTARIAN PARTY should NOT be confused with libertarians. they changed their platform years ago to ‘appeal to more voters’ and, in doing so, lost more than they gained. again, the LP should not be considered ‘libertarian’.


    • TPOL Nathan says:

      Beau, you are exactly right. The older the LP gets, the less libertarian it becomes. Whatever electoral successes the Party has, it is a laughing stock and little more than a platform for egos and bizarre behavior. Mama Liberty gave up on electoral politics a long time ago: it has taken me longer but my family and I are heading the same way. Largely because of the actions of the LP, and general disgust.


    • TPOL Nathan says:

      Again, as with Darkwing, sorry for the delay in posting and responding, due to 20-hour days!


  2. beau says:

    one should never confuse the LIBERTARIAN PARTY with libertarians. the LP made it impossible for true libertarians to be members long ago.


  3. Darkwing says:

    When I talk to people about voting, they would say: If they had a chance to win I would vote for them”. I would tell them if you did vote for them they would win. The people would give me blank stares.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s