Insanity ascendent?

As we here at TPOL understand it, Karmelo Anthony is the high school student who murdered a fellow student by stabbing him to death, apparently because he was “afraid.” (Excuse me, “person of interest” in the stabbing death.)

So far, it seems that people have donated nearly half a million to his “defense fund.” But it is claimed that his family used $400 K of it to buy a new house. Presumably fortified?

We don’t know how many people have donated how much to the family of the murdered classmate to pay for funeral expenses and help them buy what they need to defend themselves against people who want to hit on the family of “white supremacist bullies.”

One suspects that there is something about Texas – or at least East Texas – that causes brain damage to black politicians – and perhaps people in general. The water? The sunshine? Horny toad venom?

(We are reminded of General Phil Sheridan’s famous quip, “If I owned Texas and Hell, I would rent out Texas and live in Hell.”)

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Good for the goose, not for the gander?

This headline is an old Southern saying about hypocrisy.

The sort of hypocrisy that the woke powers that be of Harvard University demonstrate, as discussed in this posting by Peter Klein, a professor at Baylor University (as quoted by Tom Woods recently):

An AP story on the Trump-Harvard standoff states falsely that: “Trump’s administration has normalized the extraordinary step of withholding federal money to pressure major academic institutions to comply with the president’s political agenda and to influence campus policy.”

This is exactly what the 2011 and 2024 “Dear Colleague” letters from the Obama and Biden administrations accomplished by threatening to withhold federal funding unless schools complied with a novel interpretation of Title IX in which students accused of sexual misconduct would be convicted by a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard without the right to confront the accuser and offer evidence to challenge the allegation. This was to pressure institutions to comply with the president’s political agenda.

Put simply: the parasite called Harvard University is claiming that Trump is no different from past occupiers of 1600 PA Avenue NW. While stating the lie that he is doing something “extraordinary” (different).

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Is not this how it is supposed to work?

From Cowboy State Daily – Wyoming’s statewide online newspaper – comes this tidbit:

Not Happy With New Law, Gordon Won’t Sign New Rules Without Legislature’s OK

Gov. Mark Gordon isn’t pleased about a new law that gives the Legislature more power to override state agency rules that he has the final say to approve or deny. He says from now on, he just won’t sign new rules until a majority of legislators approve. [READ MORE]

Oh, dear. Gordon seems to be pouting, doesn’t he? After all, isn’t this supposed to be how a republican form of government with separation of powers works?

The legislature – elected by the people in districts or other ways of dividing up the State – is supposed to pass laws to regulate various matters in the State. The governor (as the chief executive) and his subordinates (cabinet members, heads of agencies, etc.) is supposed to act on those laws: generally to enforce them, or to carry out the will of the legislature which is supposed to carry out the will of the people. (Within the bounds of the constitution, of course: the limits on what government can and cannot do.) The big guy (or gal) isn’t supposed to make up laws all on his own. And the people who work for him aren’t supposed to either.

Yet that is what the Byzantine system of government regulations has resulted in. The legislature passes some law: either vague and confusing or incredibly detailed and still more confusing. The governor signs it, supposedly verifying that (a) it is needed and (b) it is something that he and the people who work under his supervision can do. But then the unelected, poorly supervised, “got my own agenda” bureaucrats (who seem to be mostly working from home these days – if they are really working) get their turn in the trough. They take a few dozen words in a section of legislation and produce thousands (or tens of thousands) of words explaining the way to interpret and apply and process whatever the law is supposedly doing. And supposedly the governor reads and understands and approves all of this.

We call “hogwash” on this – by all means the legislature has a duty to the people who elected them (idiots or not!) to decide if all this verbiage really is doing what it is supposed to be doing. And if not, should they not have the power to throw it back on the bureaucrat’s desk with a big red “F” scrawled on it?

So Gordon’s plan makes perfect sense, but he is apparently doing it in a huff, upset that the legislature dares to tell him how to run the State’s government – and indeed, the State itself. (As we understand it, the legislators overrode his veto – stick it to him, people!)

Indeed, should not every State require such a thing? And double down on Congress in DC having even a tenth of the guts that the legislature in Cheyenne had?

Of course, we understand that expecting a legislative body, whether it be Congress or a State’s own, or a local County council or town elders, to do the right thing is really stupid. They are experts of doing the wrong thing time and time again. But even if this only reduces the bureaucratic nightmare (and printing bill) by 10 percent, it seems to be worth doing.

Governor Gordon, stop the whinging. Start doing your job: executing the law, not writing it or interpreting it or twisting it – or letting the people whom you supposedly supervise do those things.

Oh, and while you are at it, how about you start treating the people of Wyoming like responsible adults, responsible free adults who can be held accountable for good and bad things they do, but don’t have to be treated like a bunch of immature adolescent wards of the State. Who knows? Maybe they’ll start to live like free people!

Posted in Commentary on the News, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why do we bash some places more than others?

The Price of Liberty is an independent voice for lovers of liberty. Established by Susan Calloway (Mama Liberty or Lady Susan), this work is carried on by the Barton family of the Pahasapa, the Black Hills. We lost Mama Liberty in an untimely way to cancer, and attempt to carry on her work. But the show love for everyone, even those we find are evil, enemies, and just plain stupid. We love them but not their actions. Although we know it is a low-probability outcome, we seek to educate them as much as we do novice and experienced lovers of liberty. We do not reject “electoral” libertarianism, but gave up on it long ago. Part of our chosen work of education – dare we say enlightenment – has always be to call a spade a spade.

More than once various people, including some in California, ask us this question: why do we hit on some places a lot more than others? It isn’t just California. We do the same for Colorado, New Mexico, and other “liberal” (or as we prefer, Transnational Regressives, or Tranzis) States. But we even bash States like Texas and Florida and Wyoming now and then: all supposedly “red” conservative States.

There are several answers. Let us look first at California: the “People’s Republic” or Left Coast or the “Bare Everything” State. California is known for its “out-of-pocket” behavior (see the short list of California slang to see what we mean.) But specifics are possible:

Continue reading
Posted in History of Liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Constitutional rights and powers – and penalties?

Some yahoo asked a question the other day: “Where in the US Constitution is gun ownership a protected right? I can’t find it.

Silly claims aside, let us see at least one answer to that question.

Let us compare this to another claim about the US Constitution: Where in the Constitution does it say there must be a separation of church and state? I can’t find it. Oh, wait, that’s right. It’s not there. It says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” That means, at the very least, that the FedGov cannot restrict anyone’s ability to practice their religion.

Is it not perfectly clear (from the writings of the Founding Fathers) that the intent of this clause was to prevent the government from intruding on people’s religious freedoms?

Continue reading
Posted in History of Liberty, Nathan's Rants, Questions answered | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Federal land grab – a quick history (part 1)

A frequently discussed issue in libertarian and free-market anarchist circles regards the fact that there is NOT constitutional power or permission given to the FedGov to own anything except for specific military and naval properties. And that only with the specific permission of the States in which those properties are located.

The constitutional citation is clear: Article I, Section 8: The Constitution grants Congress the power to “exercise exclusive legislation… over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings.”

Of course, this power has been stretched beyond any reasonable recognition. Indeed, the evidence is that the language is ignored. Blanket approval of a State’s legislature is assumed to be granted, and no Federal agency that we are aware of in the past 130 or so years has ever asked for “consent” for a purpose. Needful or not.

Continue reading
Posted in History of Liberty, Nathan's Rants, Questions answered | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Solving the world’s problems

Buckminster Fuller once wrote:
If you take all the machinery in the world and dump it in the ocean, within months more than half of all humanity will die and within another six months they’d almost all be gone; if you took all the politicians in the world, put them in a rocket, and sent them to the moon, everyone would get along fine.

We, as fans of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, call this the “B Ark solution.” Especially if we add the corporate, government, and religious bureaucrats and politicians to that group. For example, the UK’s House of Commons, portrayed in an X posting:

Why? Most of these groups actively seek to stymie human progress. At best, they hinder it. At worst, they destroy progress for the sake of their own power and gratification. The 280+ days of the political campaigns and the month-long election “day” we endured in 2024 demonstrate this danger.

(We shudder to think what the 2028 campaign will be like: long, nasty, and brutal, no doubt.)

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants, Short Takes | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Faker’s Dozen ™ Stories about Osama bin Laden

As we learn more and more about the truly amazing ways that American governments have lied, lied, and lied some more, it brings back some memories.

So here is a bit of fun – calling up (with suitable updating) a spoof/sarcastic remarks from 2011.

  1. There was NO Osama bin Laden: he was invented by (choose one or more):
    ¨House of Windsor (British Royal Family)
    ¨ Knights Templar or Society of Sion
    ¨ US Government
    ¨ Muslim Brotherhood
    ¨ Adolf Hitler III, hiding in Paraguay
    ¨ Soviet KGB scientists in underground Siberian cities
  2. There was an authentic Osama bin Laden but he was killed in Afghanistan in 2001 by (choose one):
    ¨ captured christian slave girl/concubine 
    ¨ secret SAS raiders
    ¨ Saudi Salafi commandos
    ¨ The Donald
  3. Osama bin Laden had extensive plastic surgery and replaced the man who was actually elected US President in 2008, while that person was in turn surgically modified to take bin Laden’s place, and then killed because he got tired of goat meat and wanted to come out of the cold.
  4. Osama bin Laden was a (chose one or more): ¨ CIA operative ¨ Mossad operative ¨ KGB operative ¨ FSB (Russian security) operative ¨ MI-6 operative ¨ INTERPOL operative ¨ Gestapo or Neue Gestapo operative ¨ Chinese operative, who turned rogue and finally had to be taken out. ¨ all of the above.
  5. Osama bin Laden was not killed in 2011; he was captured and is in rendition on an unmarked merchant ship while his brain is being vacuumed; the video and photos of the raid were staged and photoshopped so that everyone thinks he is dead.
  6. The Osama bin Laden killed in 2011 was an out-of-luck actor hired to pretend to be Osama and was (chose one)
    ¨ killed instead of getting paid off,
    ¨ replaced by a clone and now living in luxury in Monaco with a good shave,
    ¨a masochist who thought his lovers would eat his body after he was killed, or
    ¨ the accidental victim of an overly-complex script and friendly fire.
  7. Osama bin Laden was the (chose one of the following):
    ¨ reincarnation of the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh)
    ¨ Twelfth Imam and Mahdi, ¨ Messiah returned,
    ¨ Messiah first coming,
    ¨ a reincarnation of Balaam’s donkey, and was taken up to the Fifth Heaven by Allah. 
  8. So his death had to be staged by (chose one or more):
    ¨ Pakistani intelligence (ISI),
    ¨ Israeli intelligence (Mossad),
    ¨ CIA,
    ¨ The Sinaloa Cartel,
    ¨ Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream (Clandestine Division).
  9. Osama bin Laden was the illegitimate great-grandson of Rasputin the Mad Monk, and the center of a KGB plot to overthrow the United States that didn’t get the word to stop when the Soviet Union fell, and finally got tired of the game.
  10. Osama bin Laden was Howard Hughes, who faked his own death after he went through a secret rejuvenation process and became an enemy of the United States because they wouldn’t give back his Spruce Goose.
  11. Osama bin Laden is a cousin of the White House resident (2009-2017) and is now living in a shack in a sub-basement of the Chicago City Hall and is a janitor for the nearby Presidential Library; everything was faked.
  12. Osama bin Laden was killed but it was a fake, prepared body that was buried at sea and the real body was sent to Atlanta to be examined but stolen by secret Islamic deep-cover agents and taken to Paraguay to be reanimated in Hitler’s secret laboratories by Joseph Mengele.
  13. Osama bin Laden was killed in 2011 but rose out of the water three days later and is now executing forty years of terror to destroy the West.

© 2011 and 2025 by Simon Jester Media.  May be used with attribution.

Sometimes it doesn’t hurt to laugh at the garbage that governments try to pull. As long as we remember to question everything that they do and say.

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Leave a comment

SCOTUS and lesser Nazgul – powers and corruption

American government and society have been irretreivably warped – twisted – by the so-called justice system. The federal judicial branch and system established by the US Constitution and then changed and frankly corrupted by Congress and the influence and desires of the judges themselves.

As a result, in 2025, the American federal court system is a monstrosity that the Founding Fathers never envisioned and would not have tolerated. And because the various State systems are modeled largely on the current FedGov model, they too are tainted – and often downright corrupt.

Like the wicked judge of Jesus’ sermon, sometimes even a corrupt system and the people in it can do the right thing. At least now and then. But that is not what right, moral, or needed by a free people. And as time goes on, the corrupt nature gains more power and causes more harm.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

We expect too much of government

One reason that government reform fails, going all the way back to Babylon and Egypt and ancient Chin, is because people refuse to look at the basics. One of those is answering the question, “What should governments do?” What is the function of government? What do we want, what should we want government to do? In ancient and even fairly recent times, even the most tyrannical and totalitarian governments tried to perform all the functions that modern “civilization” expects them to do.

The liberated American State governments of 1776 and their new FedGov in 1787 did virtually none of the tasks we pile on them today – or which they grasp in a lust for power and money.

Is it any wonder that government agencies fail more and more in doing everything we expect them to do?

Continue reading
Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment