For those people who constantly claim, “if we just get to the Supreme Court…,” well, now you know the truth.
The Supreme Court of the United States has stamped “CANCELLED FOR PANDEMICS” all over the First Amendment. And by doing so, the Nazgul have demonstrated, 5-4, that they have nothing but contempt for human rights, for freedom, for liberty, and for the Bill of Rights.
These five people have refused to declare the prohibition and restrictions on religious assembly decreed by Governor Gavin Newsom, dictator of California, to be unconstitutional – a violation of the First Amendment. They are traitors, they are oathbreakers, they are enemies of the very Constitution they swore to uphold.
The ink of that stamp bleeds through every page, every article, every paragraph and sentence of the United States Constitution. Those who have claimed it is a dead letter know now they were right.
The Roberts Court, and especially the traitor John Roberts himself, have not even the pitiful excuse of the Taney Court in support of slavery, or the Warren Court in favor of murdering babies.
I made a pledge some readers may recall:
I, Nathan Alan Barton, do solemnly affirm that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
Can ANYONE explain to me how I can NOT consider John Roberts, Ginsberg, Breyer, Sotomayer, and Kagan as domestic enemies? No matter WHAT their justification?
This (the cartoon) did NOT happen either in Philadelphia at the Constitution or the Congress that forwarded the Bill of Rights to the States for their approval.
If THIS part – the First Article of Amendment of the Constitution of the United States can be declared null and void by a governor who has made himself the tyrant and dictator of the State of California AND the cowardly, traitorous act of FIVE men and women in black robes, ALL of them breaking their oaths to defend and protect the Constitution, there is NOTHING in that document which has ANY force.
ANY right, ANY power, ANY limit on power, of the Federal Government, a State government, a Tribal government, or a LOCAL government, can be taken away through the declaration of a state of emergency or a public health excuse. If some jurisdictions do NOT do so, it is not because they are restrained by any sort of law of man. No, it is entirely dependent on the “goodness of their heart” – the magnanimity of the tyrant, the mercy of an all-powerful man or woman.
This cannot stand. If the Constitution is now declared null and void, the only recourse is ALL who still honor their commitment to defend and protect, and anyone else who believes that God or nature made us free men and women.
It is NOT rebellion against government – not LEGITIMATE government. It is NOT repudiating any oaths to the Constititions, federal or local. It is NOT disobeying lawful orders – or indeed, ANY law. It is NOT a refusal to “bear true faith and allegiance” to the Constitution.
Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a “law”, and should not be called a “law”, even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.– https://constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm
Yes I know that this doesn’t strictly apply: the Dictator of California is NOT trying to enforce a “statute” or a “law” – he is enforcing a DECREE, an “Executive Order” that is not even legally AND morally applicable to individuals, whether they are a religious assembly or anything else.
So we seem, at this point, to be left with one recourse: armed resistance and the threat of arms, and as necessary, armed action, to remove these traitors, these tyrants and supporters of tyranny, from power.
I do not see any other choice. Do you?
Remember What Bush 2 said: I do not care about the GD constitution, it is just a piece of paper.
That was claimed at the time back in 2005, but even then, I found that hard to believe, given his upbringing, background, and general temperament. Since then, the claim has been reputiated in numerous venues, including the original published source. While we can’t trust all those sources, it is clear that we can’t trust the original source(s) of this claim. Factcheck.com states:
“The report that Bush “screamed” those words at Republican congressional leaders in November 2005 is unsubstantiated, to put it charitably.
“We judge that the odds that the report is accurate hover near zero. It comes from Capitol Hill Blue, a Web site that has a history of relying on phony sources, retracting stories and apologizing to its readers.
“Update, Feb. 21, 2011: The author of the Capitol Hill Blue story has now withdrawn it. Doug Thompson messaged us to say:
“Doug Thompson: This is to let you know that the piece on Bush and the Constitution has been changed and reads:
“’This article was based on sources that we thought, at the time, were reliable. We have since discovered reasons to doubt their veracity. For that reason, this article has been removed from our database.”
“‘I no longer stand behind that article or its conclusions and have said so in answers to several recent queries. In addition, I have asked that it be removed from a documentary film.'”
I think it reasonable to assume this was and is an example of fake reporting. I do not consider George W Bush to have been a good president – any more than Trump, Obama, Clinton, Bush I and so on. But as with the way Trump is being vilified and libeled and slandered (and for that matter, Obama and Clinton), much of the “information” being used is bald-faced lies.