Starmer is (we hear and hope) toast. Even Amelia, that purple-haired cutie, thinks so. And she’s been working hard to see him gone. (Of course, he is dragging it out – he may still effectively be in power for months as an election is prolonged, even though he is no longer the “Labour Leader.”)

One of the main reasons that more and more Britons have had it “up to here” with Starmer is the Tranzi push for more and more immigration. Especially from the cess-pits of the world. England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland all seem inundated with “refugees” who seem intent on recreating in the British Isles the very conditions that supposedly caused them to flee their homelands.

Britons seem condemned to relive history, don’t they? The last few decades of massive immigration into England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland are a familiar theme in the last 2,000+ years of British history. Sure, there are some differences: many (not all, by any means) of the immigrants of the last half-century are from what were British possessions: part of the now-defunct third British Empire.

(Third? Yup. See the end note.)

Today, many of those moving to Great Britain are still from Commonwealth countries. But many of those nations have jettisoned much of the horrible social and government institutions that the Brits forced on them in the 1800s and early 1900s. (Yes, we are being sarcastic.)

Anyway, like the States, the British Isles are nations of immigrants – of people from elsewhere who either invaded and conquered previous peoples, or who were refugees from monsters in human form in their old lands. The first group (invaders) no doubt fuels the fears of modern Brits about modern migration. Many of the national and ethnic groups who invaded and conquered had their “scouts” come to the Isles as peaceful and asylum-seeking settlers.

Let us look briefly at the known history of the six (or more) nations of the British Isles: Ireland, Northern Ireland, Wales, England, Scotland, Isle of Man, and possibly such places and people as Cornwall and certain parts of what is lumped together as Scotland (more than just the Highlands and Lowlands). The heritage of all the migrations to these lands can be seen in the languages, accents, physical features, and customs of the people, and the names and characteristics of the lands in what is (by American and Russian and Aussie standards, at least) a very small area.

Rome was hardly the first “invader” and “occupier” – the Celts themselves invaded and pushed back the Picts (and presumably others lost in pre-history) from the Continent. Clearly, the imprint of Latin culture was and is strong. The amalgam of Celtic, pre-Celtic, and Roman-Gaulish cultures made England a wealthy and productive people and land. But that does not distract from the negatives of conquest.

However, the fall of the SPQR, in the West especially, really did usher in a dark age for the people then labeled foreigners (“Welsh” means foreigner) in their own land. It wasn’t just Angles and Saxons. There were many more “immigrants” just “seeking freedom and opportunity” and not integrating into the Romano-British system. And the level of bloodshed, slavery, and other abuses ramped up.

Then, of course, we see just as the Anglo-Saxons were becoming “English,” we have the Scandinavians. The Jutes (later called “Danish”) invaded, occupied, and exploited the locals. (Assuming we can call the mix of Irish-Celtic, Latin, Gaulic, Germanic, and who knows who else “indigenous” by that time.) It wasn’t enough to just have the “fresh from Norway, Denmark, and Sweden” Vikings and more hitting on the Isles (Ireland and everything else, not just Great Britain). No, in 1066, along came bloody William and his Normans; direct descendants of very successful Vikings (North-men) and mushed everyone into the lower-class and exploited “Saxons” of the early English kings.

The best thing we can say about the history of the English, Scots, Welsh, and Irish is that their trials and tribulations led directly to the ideals of liberty and freedom that later Brits gave to the States. But they also drove people to flee to places where they could live more sane (if dangerous) lives of liberty.

So today, we see those who did not flee seeking liberty and opportunity running the show. After being bled dry time and time again: the Napoleonic wars, WW1, WW2. To name a few. What is left is a land which has mostly abandoned any love for personal liberty and responsibility, but…

Last year (July and August 2025), protests and a crackdown on the protestors in England were sparked by an attack by the son of Rwandan immigrants to Britain. And since then, we see His Majesty’s government cracking down even harder on those who object to allowing integration without assimilation. And this crackdown is not just on Brits. They are going after furriners too. Big time.

The conclusion is that the smart people fled, but that somehow, even some of the descendants of those who traded freedom for security are again seeking liberty. And getting smashed by the parasites who are at least the spiritual descendants of the past waves of invaders. The parasites that are inviting yet more waves to come to the green and pleasant pastures of England.

Footnote: The “first” British Empire was a creation of William the Norman overlord, and included (over several hundred years) England, Wales, Ireland, and much of modern France. The second Empire was particularly centered around the North American colonies, and the third around Africa, Asia, and Oceana.