“Absolutely, I mean if you look at the Second Amendment it was that you would have militia to protect yourself in case the government came and attacked citizens.”
“First of all, if the government were to come to disarm you, you would not be able to use an automatic weapon to defend yourself. Let’s be serious. We’re in a world of drones now so the Second Amendment would not help you in that area. It is absurd to try to cite that.”
“People do not have the right to unregulated rights in this country. And I think that for those that use the Second Amendment [they] are conceding that they have no argument on why you need a magazine with 100 rounds of ammunition or 30 rounds of ammunition.”
Answer: Al Sharpton. Stupid is as stupid does, and it is hard to get more stupid (at least in public and giving the appearance thereof) than this.
Imagine: no “right to unregulated rights” Seriously, people, why is this man not in an insane asylum so that he won’t hurt other people? First off, thanks in large part to people like Sharpton, the government DOES come and attack you for no honest reason or purpose: we read about it every day. As anyone familiar with the history of Philadelphia or DC or NYC knows. Second, if being “a world of drones” makes the Second Amendment absurd, why don’t all those “nasty folks” over in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Yemen give up? Because even in a world of drones, adequate weaponry CAN help you defend yourselves and your family and neighbor from being attacked by government or other thugs. Sharpton’s comments about “unregulated rights” should be enshrined next to his buddy’s comments about Guam tipping over.
The Price of Liberty 