Truckers dilemma

By Nathan Barton

Business Insider’s recently discussed “Black Smoke Matters.” This brought to mind frequent sightings as my family and I traveled the roads this last year.

Image result for trucking strike Image result for semi truck traffic jam

A Facebook group (with an 11-member board) is organizing truckers for a one-day strike on Friday, 12th April, three months from now. They already have 12,000 to 15,000 drivers signed up. (That sounds like a lot, but there are about 1.8 million over-the-road (OTR) truckers here in the Fifty States.)

Why strike?  Back in December 2017, a new Federal rule mandated electronic logging devices (ELD) in virtually all OTR trucks.  The FMCSA (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration) rule implements a law (passed by Congress and pushed by the Obummer regime).  Now, any cop or motor carrier inspector (as at one of those ubiquitous ports of entry which dot the Fifty States) can link to the ELD and see how many hours and miles that truck (and driver) have on them.

It is tied to the “Hours of Service” (HOS) regulations, which apply to drivers/truckers who have to have CDLs – Commercial Drivers Licenses. It is much easier to lose your CDL for violations or infractions, than for us to lose our regular drivers licenses. (Don’t you love all those acronyms?)

The HOS rules mandate that a driver cannot work more than 14 hours, of which only 11 can be spent driving.  Including mandatory 30-minute breaks, waiting while cargo is being loaded, or while fueling or waiting for tires to be changed or other work.  Even though drivers get paid by the mile, not the hour. Before the ELDs were mandated, paper, handwritten logs were used.  Those could be fudged. And often were. (Anyone who has read Starman Jones by Robert Heinlein may recall the situation involving Max and an OTR driver on a guild-dominated future Earth.)

Now, when the time is up, it is up.  After eleven hours of driving, or fourteen hours of “work,” the trucker has to have a continuous period of 10 hours in which she cannot drive.  If the truck is equipped with a sleeper, he can stay in it (with the engine off).  The argument for the Federal rule was safety.  FMCSA and various groups claimed it would prevent 1,714 crashes, 522 injuries, and 24 deaths each year. (24 deaths out of about 4,000 fatalities per year involving heavy trucks.) The American Trucking Association (ATA), a trucking industry group (not a truckers’ group) and many other nanny-state organizations supported it.

What happens if they break the time limits, now tracked involuntarily by their ELD?

They get caught the next time they go through a weigh station (port of entry) or are stopped for a checkpoint/roadside inspection by some state’s motor carrier division.  Guaranteed, because they self-incriminate themselves, providing the evidence to issue a citation, fine, and… revocation of their CDL. Instantly putting them out of work, and possibly incurring additional thousands of dollars of costs.  If their CDL is revoked, they may not even be allowed to drive their rig to the next town, let alone hundreds of miles back to their hometown.  And the fines can be in the thousands.

Which brings me back to my family and business travels.

As we travel (especially on major highways like Interstates 25, 70, 80, and 90 and US Highways 85, 385, 287, 160, and others) and at project sites, we saw the results of this rule.  Thousands of trucks parked in the middle of nowhere, as well as at truck stops and rest areas. All times of day or night. Because their time had run out, and they had to stop for that mandatory 30-minute nap and especially for that 10-hour continuous mandated time off.

So when they have to, they stop.  We’ve seen two or three trucks parked forty or fifty miles from the nearest town on dirt or grass. A dozen squeezed into a single rest area designed to park five or six. Outside our office/temporary lodging for a project on two major highways, we’ve seen 20-30 trucks parked in vacant blocks, with six-inch-deep mud and not even a portapotty.  In a town with no fuel station for trucks and just a single cafe open barely 12 hours a day, thirty miles from the next nearest town (without much more).  And we’ve seen a hundred or more trucks trying to find room at a truck stop with just fifty or sixty spaces.

I can’t imagine what it must be like in California or back East in the heavily populated areas.

As a result of this government action we find:

  • Increasing transportation costs for hauling by truck (71% of cargo in the Fifty States) due to loss of efficiency and delays.
  • Decreasing wages for truck drivers making it harder to make ends meet. (Truckers are paid by the mile: they get no pay while people are loading or unloading, or for their mandatory naptime, even though the feds still say they are “working.”)
  • Fewer drivers (they are quitting to find better work)
  • Drivers taking more risks to try and stay ahead and meet their contracts and make a living. (For example, sticking to legal speed limits despite icy roads or high winds; pushing yellow lights, delaying proper inspections and maintenance while on the road.)

So, once again, a government action has massive unintended consequences, some negating the very reason the law was passed and the regulation created.

These “Black Smoke Matters” people aren’t even trying to completely eliminate the new rule: they just want officials to listen to them more and let them participate in making rules. And to make the public more aware of the problems they face and how it impacts them. But I think they will just be ignored, strike or not.

Some blame the decline of unions for this getting by, but the Teamsters long demonstrated their concern is for dues, companies and government, not the truckers. Many of the truckers recognize this as just one more way in which their lives and daily activities are controlled more and more by government. I think that they have something.



About TPOL Nathan

Follower of Christ Jesus (a christian), Pahasapan (resident of the Black Hills), Westerner, Lover of Liberty, Free-Market Anarchist, Engineer, Army Officer, Husband, Father, Historian, Writer, Evangelist. Successor to Lady Susan (Mama Liberty) at TPOL.
This entry was posted in Nathan's Rants and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Truckers dilemma

  1. soapweed says:

    Nathan: Not to mention the backlash from haulers of live cargoes, who have had their doomsday pushed to Mar 31, if the story doesn’t become fiction. A bunch of petty rulers who have not been around anything critter bigger than their childhood parakeet, and even then, their mommy changed the birds cage fish wrap, not the precious little princesses.
    CDOT or contractor for your shekels?
    I still have your old Tribal Wisdom vs Government hanging on the wall……a classic!
    Thanks from Deer Trail


    • TPOL Nathan says:

      Dear Soapweed:
      I saw that “live cargo” folks got a temporary stay of execution, and thought about (still am) saving that for future commentary…
      Cruising up and down I-70 and US-40 and CO-59 most of this year on projects, I saw and talked to a lot of folks about HOS and ELD problems. No one expects it to get any better, which is why a lot of people are getting out of trucking completely. And trying to figure out how to juggle ranching or farming with trucking – even their own, much less for anyone else.
      A perfect example of the risks of enforcing these sorts of petty bureaucrat regs (and the often more-stupid Congressional excuses for them) is the overpass that was taken out at Seibert this year, and the problems with letting people (especially big-rig drivers) even know. An extra 30 minutes can mean getting to nap in your cab for a long time just a few miles away from home. Especially if you know that Deputy who is ticked off because your son got the rebound is patrolling that stretch of road. And that doesn’t take into account the delays if you decide to risk that county road that has the really soft shoulders – and get to pay someone to pull you out of the ditch.


  2. Darkwing says:

    More government, less freedom. This is the way the government can spy on the drivers and do not have to leave their, heated/ air cond offices.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s