Colorado today had declared a “state of emergency.” Or rather, the rich, homosexual playboy “businessman” who bought the governorship has declared the purple-turning-blue “green state” in a state of emergency. Of course, he seems to be fully supported by the bureaucracy (not necessarily ALL the bureaucrats, I admit) and the statists, the soccer moms and Mrs. Grundy types and the woke and social justice warriors.
Why? Coronavirus, of course. Beer Flu. A total of 15 people – get that, FIFTEEN – people in a state of 5.85 million people – have been diagnosed with it. No deaths, yet. No indication that any of these 15 people are likely going to die from it. No indication that they have done anything to spread it, to infect others.
Why?
First, because that is what “progressive” (regressive) states and governors do. Polis has the example of California, Washington, New York, Ohio, and elsewhere: Colorado must prove it has rejected its conservative, western, resource-based, family-friendly, evil past by working with the big boys now.
Second, because of the benefits of emergencies. As someone once quipped about the abysmal behavior of robber barons and crony capitalists, “Bankruptcy is the natural state of big business.” Indeed, it sometimes seems to be the preferred state. So it is with government. Emergencies are the preferred state of government, in order to achieve its goals of maintaining and increasing control of the population, extracting revenue from them, and ensuring their positions of power, wealth, and influence. Here in the Fifty States, it is also a surefire way of getting more money from the FedGov to bolster the budgets and spending of state and local and tribal governments.
Crises give an excuse for declaring emergencies. Even medical emergencies, and now we know, even POSSIBLE medical emergencies.
We now, in Colorado, have a new and very low threshold, for defining an “emergency” in Colorado: fifteen people get sick, and it is “an emergency” for everyone in the state. (Although I admit, there may be (according to Polis) another thirteen people who may have Beer Flu. And some of them are – gasp!- in Aspen!)
So, if fifteen children get measles in Julesburg, or Kim, or Mancos, or Rangely? And the state DOESN’T declare a statewide emergency, then it must be because the powers that be in Denver hate rural children, right? You can come up with many scenarios.
There is, no doubt, a third reason that Democrat Polis declared a statewide emergency. Because it is an attack on Trump. As a followup to their so-successful impeachment of Trump, his supposed failure to deal with Beer Flu has been a very common meme. Polis and the Colorado General Assembly burnish their Democratic credentials.
And after all, panic must be shared. In a world where various festivals are cancelled (SXSW, Arnold Classic in Ohio, Venice Carnival, etc.) , where schools are closed when there is no sign of illness in their communities, and where panic can lead to economic maladies (that can be blamed on Trump and other political opponents). And panic loves company. Especially in various nations where mob rule is increasingly common and growing – whether it is the yellow-vests and Muslim mobs of France or Antifa in Seattle.
And worse is happening around the world. Panic, emergencies, crisis, power and control all go together.
Italy, for example, has already expanded a 15-province state of emergency to the entire nation. AND make it illegal to have a wedding, be baptized, or have a funeral. And the pope, beloved statist that he is, has gone along with it and forbidden mass from being celebrated (except, apparently, by video) until the 3rd of April (which just happens to be Good Friday, not some date identified by medical personnel as the end of the Beer Flu danger.)
North Korea, on the other hand, has stated time and again that there is NO coronavirus in the Hermit Kingdom. But 180 North Korean soldiers have died of a mysterious flu-like illness, and their rations have been more than doubled. (North Korea is well-known for keeping its junior soldiers malnourished and even near starvation.)
Fortunately, not all states, not all countries, and not all businesses are panicking and making unwise, damaging mistakes. For example, the annual construction and mining equipment show, ConExpo, in Las Vegas, will go on as scheduled next week in Las Vegas. Of course, we could point out that the vast majority of people attending THAT conference are responsible adults who run businesses and take risks in business and life on a daily basis, not bureaucrats or welfare clients.
(By the way, one source of info worldwide is Business Insider’s special page. However, I’ve noticed errors and omissions there.
Who benefits from closing all the schools?
Rob Morse, in his “Slow Facts” webzine, on Monday, asks a good question: “Are bureacrats shutting down schools for their benefit or for yours?
When the same cities that close all their schools to supposedly prevent the close contact that helps a virus to spread, but open up large child care centers to house the children during the day who have no place to stay because their parents have to work to support them?
When the workers in those child care centers, that are even MORE likely to be exposed to the virus are only temporary public employees (if not just contractor employees), “subprofessional” and probably unable to afford health insurance themselves because of low pay and the “benefits of ObummerCare? And when those workers – those “caregivers” are more likely to be unqualified, untrained, and themselves carriers – because of hasty hiring practices? To say nothing of the increased potential that some of those caregivers are predators: pedophiles who cannot be detected by proper vetting because of the urgency to hire them?
When the children in those centers are less likely to have sufficient staff to discipline them and help them maintain this “social standoff” distance, and are more likely to come in contact with a lot more than the 15-30 students in their own classrooms? And get poorer quality food from makeshift kitchens instead of the well-equipped school kitchens? And probably having to spend more time crowded in buses taking them to the centers instead of their neighborhood schools?
But the bureaucrats, and especially their attorneys and risk management specialists don’t really care about the children, no matter what they claim. The educrats are more concerned about things like potential lawsuits and the medical costs of treating unionized teachers who won’t be in those child care centers. And more concerned about potential for these educrats having to take personal responsibility for the children that parents entrust to their care?
And when the child care center buildings are also more likely to be unsuitable for this use, unable to meet codes, than purpose-built school buildings? Thus risking everything from poor fire protection to failure of sewer and sanitation, and thus increasing the risk of injury and illness to the children?
When you put this all together, you just have an incredible checklist of the evils of government-run, tax-supported, and irresponsible, self-serving, and completely objectionable “education systems.”
And the question as always, is why are we so foolish as to entrust our precious children to these institutions.