By Nathan Barton
Recently, one of my sons and I were discussing the current situation in the Imperial Capital, where the struggle between the Donald and the Democratic Party – and a number of others – in Congress is growing wilder all the time.
As several commenters have pointed out in recent days, the opposition in Congress and other venues (including many parts of the Executive Branch and the Judiciary – and much of the GOP) is far beyond just spoiling his agenda, just thwarting his plans. It is obvious that the effort is directed to making his administration, his regime, completely illegitimate. To go far beyond what any politically powerful opponents of the Wizaard O’bummer, for example, did in more than eight years. Not just to counter him, but to destroy him.
My son suggested that one of the reasons for the continued (and growing) antipathy is because, even if the man now at 1600 Pennsylvania is (de facto) a politician, he is not really a “politician.” It is as if the College of Cardinals elected a layman, who never even served as an altar boy, to be Pope. Continue reading
Trump the greater warmonger?
By Nathan Barton
The website TheAntiMedia is screaming about how much more drone bombing Trump is doing than the Wizard O’bummer did, as reported in Freedom Net Daily reporting calculations from a source at the Council on Foreign Relations that “US drone strikes have gone up 432% since Trump took office.”
Now, the CFR is hardly on my list of reliable sources of information (for that matter, Antimedia isn’t either).
But what makes this something to comment about is their analysis, based on these calculations: “During… two terms in office, he approved 542 such targeted strikes in 2,920 days — one every 5.4 days. From his inauguration through today, President Trump had approved at least 36 drone strikes or raids in 45 days — one every 1.25 days.'”
Not challenging the idea that Trump is a warmonger, this sort of calculation is actually not valid. I love calculations, as readers of these commentaries know. But the analysis is not good, not valid. Comparing just a month and a half to a full 96 months just doesn’t work. If this 1.25 day frequency continues for six months, a year, two years, then maybe, but NOT for just 1/100th the time. Continue reading →