More on Harris and Walz – and Trump and Vance

Ah, what a quartet of statists we find on the two old party presidential tickets this year! (Assuming, of course, that we don’t get yet another surprise at Chicago in a couple of weeks.)

With less than three months to Der Tag, let us look at these so-august personages. Are any of them suitable for being Massa now or in the future?

With a deep breath…

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Walz, Minnesota, and military service

The tapping of Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota for the veep nomination by dear Kammie about 48 hours ago has reminded people of just how bad American politics is. And the mental, intellectual, and moral bankruptcy of the Farm-Labor Party of Minnesota and the Democratic Party in all fifty States and the territories.

It also brings back memories of the worst days of the Pandemic Panic and the Black Lives Matter movement and the response to the death of George Floyd in Minnesota and nationwide.

And it is a reminder that the system Heinlein described in Starship Troopers more than 60 years ago does not result in a utopia. “Military service guarantees citizenship” (and therefore the vote and ability to run for and serve in public office) is not a bad idea. Even though it is condemned as supposedly being fascist and militaristic by many. But like all human systems and ideas, it has flaws and weaknesses: on average military veterans have greater civic virtue but not every veteran has that characteristic. Walz is the poster boy for such a lack – even though he has some good points. But as a sixty-year-old, he is the product of the many flaws of both the American military system for the last fifty-plus years and our society.

And of course, we cannot forget that even Heinlein’s ideas of human government are still tainted by the inherent evil and corruption of government.

But to Walz himself:

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Government lies: the Consumer Price Index

The most recent Consumer Price Index numbers are out for June (July’s are not yet out: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm), and they show that the cost of food overall, food at home, and food away from home (dining out, for example) rose across the board.

Here’s a look (and shudder!) at how some prices have changed month over month:

  • Food: increase 0.2%
  • Food at home: increase 0.1%
  • Food away from home: increase 0.4%
  • Energy: decrease 2%
  • New vehicles: decrease 0.2%
  • Used vehicles: decrease 1.5%
  • Apparel: increase 0.1%
  • Medical care service: increase 0.2%

It’s not uncommon to now see a dozen eggs selling for well over $5 per carton. A fresh gallon of whole milk on average costs over $4. And staples like flour and beef have increased in price by about 33% since early 2020.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What about Israel? (part 2) History

Continuing our discussion of Israel (part 1 here)

The modern State of Israel can trace its evils (and its goods) back to biblical times.

The Sanhedrin (the Jewish high council) was very much opposed to those nasty rustic followers of Jesus of Nazareth – and not just because they were Galillean hicks. They arrested and imprisoned many of Jesus’ followers following His death (even though they claimed He had not risen). Killed some: Stephen stoned to death, James beheaded. It is highly likely that others were killed as well. And the authorities sent agents into other jurisdictions to intimidate and arrest those who had “abandoned” their faith to follow this Messiah. (Saul of Tarsus went to Damascus on such a mission – again unlikely to be the only such act.)

This was clearly done with the knowledge and (at least tacit) approval of the Roman government in Judea and Syria. From the Roman point of view, keeping Judea stable was important for several reasons.

Continue reading
Posted in History of Liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What about Israel? (part 1)

Many libertarians delight in bashing the State of Israel for its many sins (in their eyes). Not just, but especially, self-named “left libertarians.” (Who seem to want to find more in common with certain regressivist (“progressives”) than with fellow lovers of liberty.) On the other hand, many other libertarians delight in proclaiming their love for Israel, and at least some religious libertarians see the State of Israel as a fulfillment of prophesy and especially loved by God.

As one religiously-observant Hebrew once quipped, “I’m not sure how long we can endure being God’s chosen people. It’s like wearing a target bulls-eye.”

The war with Hamas, invasion of Gaza, and now a seeming two-front or three-front war just increases the debate and further separates the various sides. As does the Woke betrayal of Zionism.

We here at TPOL do not fall into either of these camps. We do NOT consider the State of Israel to be a fulfillment of God’s prophesies in the Bible, nor any longer to be a physical nation which is “chosen of God.” At the same time, we DO see the State of Israel as an alternative in the Middle East, and far FAR preferable, to anything Muslims – especially the Arabs – and most especially the so-called “Palestinians” have as far as a society that can promote, encourage and protect liberty. At least not as long as the vast majority of Arabs are Muslim, tribal, and exhibit an insane hatred of Jews and the West. And behave like their (version of) God: cruel, vindictive, and more.

Even so, we consider Israel to be – like all human, compulsory government-controlled lands and people – to be wrong. Their actions – even if motivated by a need for self-defense – are often evil: cruel and unthinking and based on vengeance. but as authoritarian as the Israeli regime is, I see it as very much preferable – for people of ALL faiths and ALL ethnicities and backgrounds – to any current Arab regime.

Still, Israel in 2020 is no bastion of liberty, and nowhere close to a libertarian society, much less a minarchist government. Like all mandatory governments, the Israeli government does many evil things.

One of those areas of evil actions was reported several years back, featured in Freedom Net Daily. It still should rankle lovers of liberty:

Israel: Regime Orders Evangelical GOD TV Off Air (from NDTV [India]) “Israel’s media watchdog said Sunday that it had withdrawn the broadcast licence from US-based evangelical network GOD TV, accusing it of seeking to target Jews with Christian content. International Christian network’s GOD TV launched its Shelanu (Hebrew for ‘ours’) channel at the end of April [2020] on Israeli cable provider Hot, describing it as catering to Christians. But the channel provoked an immediate outcry in Israel, with then-communications minister David Amsalem accusing it of being a ‘missionary channel’ seeking to convert Jews to Christianity. … Israel enjoys vigorous support from evangelical movements in the United States but keeps a lid on missionary work in the Holy Land. While Israeli law only expressly forbids the giving of money or gifts to encourage conversions to another religion, missionary activities in general are closely monitored by the authorities and are offensive to many Israelis.”

Israel is NOT a monoreligious state, but it certainly has an oddity in the 21st Century. A state religion – Judaism – which has direct ties with, and some control over, the “secular” government of the State of Israel. (Even more so, if officially so, than Utah!) While far from a theocracy (a government in which priests rule), there is no First Amendment in Israeli basic law, protecting freedom of speech and religion in the way that Americans have.

And in this matter, the Israelis of 2020 very closely resemble those of AD 30-40, which will be discussed in detail in the second part of this commentary.

Israel today is an integral part of the post-WW2 international order built and maintained by the FedGov, even while it is frequently at odds with various administrations in DC and not a “formal” ally in many ways. And despite its oddities. Traits that make it in many ways at odds with American values (or at least those claimed to be “American”.) At the same time, its existence has been a constant flashpoint, for more than half a century.

Israelis – or at least most of their politicians and military leaders – understand both the value of the special relationship with DC and how far they can push. As they also understand that the wrong moves – or stupidity on one or both sides – can suddenly end that. Just as happened in the First Century AD.

But no one who is a lover of liberty should ever see Israel, and the Israeli “questions” as one dimensional. Whether they are haters of Israel (for whatever reasons – and there are many) or supporters. In our work of promoting, protecting, and expanding liberty, the Israelis can be valuable allies AND dangerous enemies.

Unlike their bitter and dogmatic enemies, the Islamic world, the Ummah. Whether those Muslims are Arab or Iranian or Pakistani. Whether they are Sunni or Shia or something else. Whether they are Islamists or “moderates.” Free speech? Freedom of assembly? Rights of the accused? Please.

Don’t misunderstand – a Muslim can be a lover of liberty also. But such Muslims are few and far between. As societies and cultures and nations, Islamic people are bitter and vengeful enemies not just of Jews but of liberty. (A subject for another time.)

The more we understand Israel and its history, the better we can deal with both the benefits and the threats that Israel of 2020 presents to liberty. And there are both.

See part 2.

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Got free speech? Got liberty?

News headlines herald new and ongoing attacks on fundamental liberties. Sometimes by a celebrity, sometimes by a politician… (Yes, we know it is often hard to tell the difference.) But often by a lot of people. And of course the fundamental liberties that they attack are

Are these real? Or just hype? Clickbait?

It appears to be both. Looking at recent headlines and actually going beyond the first paragraph or two, many appear to be serious efforts to take freedoms away from the masses. But others are merely reporting some twisted little piece of legislation designed to satisfy donors and fringe constituencies. Or mad(cap) efforts to get a little more news coverage and five seconds on the nightly news.

Continue reading
Posted in Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Baker’s Dozen (TM) Ways to get rid of the States (or some of them)

You may have seen some of the current clickbait, telling you “These ten states will be empty by 2025” or “Everyone leaving these states” only to find out (again) that the click-bait headlines are never truthful, accurate, or really reflect the contents of the story. Whether in print or online.

But…

We find many different groups (not just the Woke and radical democrats) that want to get rid of the States and create a unitary government for America.

Continue reading
Posted in Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

War coming?

The times, the times they are a changing. That was a popular song back in the 1960s and 1970s during the war in Southeast Asia and upheavals in the States.

It has applied on and off since then. Today perhaps more than ever.

As we begin the month of August, we recall the “Guns of August” remind us of the outbreak of the Great War in Europe. Again, then, there were warnings of the upheaval to come, but no one had the slightest idea of the incredible bloodbath that flooded Europe for more than four years of declared war, much less the decades of bloody struggle that would result: the chaos in the German and the Austro-Hungarian Empires, the horrors of the fall of the Russian Empire and the revolutions and civil war, and more millions dead. Much less the rise of fascism in Italy, the National Socialists in Germany, and the Falange in Spain. Or the evils of the New Deal in the States.

Today we still live with the results of the evils triggered that long-ago day in the Balkans.

Right now, Stateside, we have hints of something which could very similarly blow up in our faces. And that of everyone in the world.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Deep state supreme?

Although Michael Rectenwald wrote this commentary a few days ago, before our (lying?) eyes saw Uncle Joe sitting in the (real?) oval office, he makes some very important points. He also comes to a conclusion – but perhaps a century (or more) late that the facts more than support.

The Republic is dead. The zombie corpse that replaced it under Wilson (if not Teddy or even earlier) has started to fall apart – limbs not just dragging but rotting apart.

And “our democracy” that supposedly replaced it? That, too, to continue the simile, has had its heart staked. Because it too was a fraud, a sham, a play-act that lulled any and all to their doom. And the doom of the authoritative and increasingly centralized empire that replaced the Republic.

Continue reading
Posted in Guest commentary, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Baker’s Dozen (TM) Quotes on bearing arms

This Baker’s Dozen is boiled down from several dozen quotes: note that not all of the quotes are from Founding Fathers and not all from so-called conservatives. Or libertarians.

The Second Amendment to the US Constitution does not give us the right to keep and bear arms. Nor is the right to do so limited just to law-abiding American citizens: it is a inherent human right that we have because we are made by, and in the image of, God the Creator.

  1. “An armed society is a polite society.” – Robert A. Heinlein
  2. “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms.” – Richard Henry Lee
  3. “The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” – Samuel Adams
  4. “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.” – Alexander Hamilton
  5. “A free people ought to be armed.” – George Washington
  6. “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.” – Thomas Jefferson
  7. “A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained in arms, is the best most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison
  8. “Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny, or in private self-defense.” – John Adams
  9. “I would like to see every woman know how to handle firearms as naturally as they know how to handle babies.” – Annie Oakley
  10. “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” – Benjamin Franklin
  11. “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.” – George Mason
  12. “The right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny.” – Hubert H. Humphrey
  13. “Civilian ownership of firearms is not only a constitutional right, but also a fundamental aspect of the American identity, rooted in our history, culture, and tradition.” – Ronald Reagan
Posted in Guest commentary, Nathan's Rants, Short Takes | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments