Protect? Serve? or Serve up?

By Nathan Barton

I was a bit surprised to not find one of Freedom Net Daily’s usual pointed or sarcastic headlines this morning on a story from the San Francisco Chronicle about an East Bay traffic stop that led to the seizure of 300 pounds of cannabis and $1 million cash.

“A traffic stop by law enforcement officers in the East Bay led to the seizure of more than 300 pounds of marijuana and more than $1 million in cash, the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office said Monday. The drug bust began when a California Highway Patrol officer spotted a driver on Saturday operating a van while talking on a cell phone, officials say. The CHP officer attempted to pull the van over on Interstate 580 in Castro Valley to cite the driver for a cell phone violation, officials said. While the van was stopped, a sedan pulled up and cut off the CHP car, enabling the van to flee the scene, officials said. Both cars raced away, but were stopped in Castro Valley, and the two drivers were arrested. Officers soon learned why the suspects tried to get away. The sedan contained eight pounds of marijuana and the van had another 200 pounds of weed packed inside, officials said.”

First off, does anyone else suspect that the CHP has more important things to do than stop someone for talking on a cell phone while driving? Surely there were people speeding excessively, or DUI (it was a Saturday night), or broken down and needing assistance – or even with burned-out license plate lights – there on I-580. This nanny-state law on cell phone use addresses a single form of distracted driving. Eating a Big Mac, doing your hair or makeup, fussing with the kids (or the dog) are all forms of distracted driving, but only using a cell phone is EVIL enough to be a crime which “requires” cops to disrupt the normal flow of traffic and create obstacles. Which makes you ask if the real reason for this offense being an offense is to give police an excuse to stop and “inspect” the vehicle for whatever the popular current crimes are? To be controllers?

Second, this seizure of cannabis and cash is nothing at all more than theft – “legalized” theft by the thugs of the state. Last time I checked (and as of the 2016 election) BOTH of these are legal in the People’s Republic, thanks to a lot of work and despite continued efforts to make them verbotten. But cops clearly welcome any excuse, and manufacture situations (like this one) in which they can “legitimately” seize such dangerous contraband.

Third, this road chase across large chunks of freeway in the densely populated region, as almost all do (except maybe that infamous slow motion chase of that one celebrity years ago), endanger the public safety far more than 300 pounds of pot or a million of the most highly-contaminated faux money (bills).

And for all we know, the cannabis and the cash was on its way to Nevada or Oregon (where both are also legal) or even overseas, so we have the CHP interfering with interstate or international trade. A clear violation of both due process and freedoms supposedly enshrined in both the California and united States constitutions.

We have yet another example of stupid government tricks. But why didn’t FND do their usual good job of pointing these things out? I hope that they can restore their usual practice of twisting the tail of the state.

A free people don’t need this kind of “protecting and serving” – if indeed we need state-enabled and theft-funded traffic cops at all. Certainly not traffic cops who make it clear that their reason to exist has NOTHING to do with highway safety and protecting people from threats to life and health.

Enough is enough.

(PS: Knowing the ambivalent status of cannabis in California, the stupid law on cell phones, and the greed of the police, I should point out that the two drivers were very stupid themselves. They should have known better. Also, a disclaimer: I do not personally use cannabis and do not promote or advocate the use of it – or for that matter, living in California or carrying large sums of money!)

Mama’s Note: I’ll bet that the “weed,” as well as the money, will just vanish. Probably going to be a high old time at the CHP barracks, and who knows where all else.  Do as they say, not as they do. Hypocrites and thieves. Indeed…

About TPOL Nathan

Follower of Christ Jesus (a christian), Pahasapan (resident of the Black Hills), Westerner, Lover of Liberty, Free-Market Anarchist, Engineer, Army Officer, Husband, Father, Historian, Writer, Evangelist. Successor to Lady Susan (Mama Liberty) at TPOL.
This entry was posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Protect? Serve? or Serve up?

  1. Darkwing says:

    Ladies and gentlemen: these laws, cell phone use, broken tail light, cracked window and hundreds of others are the only way these Gestapo can get their quotas. I knew CHP in CA and highway cops here in NC; they all told me they had quotes, that is how they judged their work.


    • MamaLiberty says:

      Not convinced that most departments actually set “quotas,” as if the goons have to be forced to do these things, somehow. I think they are perfectly clear that their job security rests in how much loot they can collect – by whatever means they find convenient or entertaining – and I’m sure they turn in as much as they must to keep the bosses happy. I’m sure that some of them are perfectly happy to break tail lights, plant drugs and do anything else they can think of to “justify” their highway robbery… and sometimes they don’t even bother with any sort of “justification,” since they have pretty broad immunity from any kind of accountability or consequences. Except the consequences of trying to be honest, of course. The “blue line” won’t stand for much of that.


  2. Nathan,

    I’m pretty much in charge of pointed and sarcastic headlines at Rational Review News Digest / Freedom News Daily, so that was my laziness at fault. Sometimes when it’s someone else entering a story and I’m busy, I let the headlines go through straight 🙂


    • MamaLiberty says:

      That’s ok, Thomas. 🙂 We appreciate the sarcasm very much, but I suspect most of us can easily supply our own if we have to. LOL And anyone who can’t probably doesn’t appreciate it anyway.


  3. Dave K says:

    Thanks for this post. I just finished reading the Cato Institute report on the drug war. You can find it at for those wanting to see the cost of this stupid war both in monetary terms and in personal terms. This idiocy must stop. End the Drug War now!


    • MamaLiberty says:

      You won’t get any argument about that here, Dave. The question is how to stop it. One of the most vicious parts of this cannabis legalization is the fact that the controllers use it to deny ANY user their natural right to bear arms. So mere “legalization” of cannabis or other drugs won’t solve all the problems. But, I guess, it’s a start.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s