By Nathan Barton
Repeating the evils of history?
Back in the 8th Century AUC (better known today as the 1st Century Anno Domini), life was simple. Not just simple but short and anything but sweet.
The life of children in the Greek and Roman worlds (and indeed, much of the known world) was particularly bad. Death rates from childhood diseases decimated infants and toddlers. Greco-Roman society in particular was very hazardous for the newborn, because of the custom (apparently in all social levels) of exposing infants – taking unwanted newborns and leaving them in a field to be either collected by slavers (or perhaps a few good people) or eaten by wolves or other predators. Generally, Greek custom was similar, as was that of many other cultures. The Hebrews are often pointed out as exceptions to this, whether in Canaan (Palestine) or in the Dispora across the Empire and in Mesopotamia and Persia.
The emperor Constantine (yeah, that one – the “religious convert to christianity) made it legal to sell infants in 313, regardless of the status of their parents: this was supposedly a compassionate measure to reduce the exposure and death of infants. Continue reading
When is self-defense NOT?
By Nathan Barton
In California, convenience store owner Min Kim was just convicted of manslaughter for gunning down the criminal who tried to rob his store, and he will be in prison for eight years. As reported in Freedom Post, the store’s surveillance cameras saw the robber come in, try to steal something, get accosted, get into a fight during which he tried to take Kim’s gun (and failed), then tried to escape. Kim shot and killed him in the doorway of the store.
It is a sad situation, and Kim admitted he had done wrong and that the shooting was not self-defense. To make matters worse, a previous robbery had seen Kim’s wife shot and wounded just a month earlier. And the dead robber had been convicted for trying to kidnap a young girl – a crime for which he received a “horribly severe” punishment of eight months in jail. Kim’s community is better off with the scumbag dead, no doubt.
But today, even cops (well, sometimes) are convicted of unjustified killing when they gun down someone in the back, fleeing. I think that the jury had a pretty open and shut case.
This happens much too often. People do not understand just what self-defense means, and when there is a moral justification for using deadly force. Why is this? Continue reading →