What about Israel? (part 2) History

Continuing our discussion of Israel (part 1 here)

The modern State of Israel can trace its evils (and its goods) back to biblical times.

The Sanhedrin (the Jewish high council) was very much opposed to those nasty rustic followers of Jesus of Nazareth – and not just because they were Galillean hicks. They arrested and imprisoned many of Jesus’ followers following His death (even though they claimed He had not risen). Killed some: Stephen stoned to death, James beheaded. It is highly likely that others were killed as well. And the authorities sent agents into other jurisdictions to intimidate and arrest those who had “abandoned” their faith to follow this Messiah. (Saul of Tarsus went to Damascus on such a mission – again unlikely to be the only such act.)

This was clearly done with the knowledge and (at least tacit) approval of the Roman government in Judea and Syria. From the Roman point of view, keeping Judea stable was important for several reasons.

Continue reading
Posted in History of Liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What about Israel? (part 1)

Many libertarians delight in bashing the State of Israel for its many sins (in their eyes). Not just, but especially, self-named “left libertarians.” (Who seem to want to find more in common with certain regressivist (“progressives”) than with fellow lovers of liberty.) On the other hand, many other libertarians delight in proclaiming their love for Israel, and at least some religious libertarians see the State of Israel as a fulfillment of prophesy and especially loved by God.

As one religiously-observant Hebrew once quipped, “I’m not sure how long we can endure being God’s chosen people. It’s like wearing a target bulls-eye.”

The war with Hamas, invasion of Gaza, and now a seeming two-front or three-front war just increases the debate and further separates the various sides. As does the Woke betrayal of Zionism.

We here at TPOL do not fall into either of these camps. We do NOT consider the State of Israel to be a fulfillment of God’s prophesies in the Bible, nor any longer to be a physical nation which is “chosen of God.” At the same time, we DO see the State of Israel as an alternative in the Middle East, and far FAR preferable, to anything Muslims – especially the Arabs – and most especially the so-called “Palestinians” have as far as a society that can promote, encourage and protect liberty. At least not as long as the vast majority of Arabs are Muslim, tribal, and exhibit an insane hatred of Jews and the West. And behave like their (version of) God: cruel, vindictive, and more.

Even so, we consider Israel to be – like all human, compulsory government-controlled lands and people – to be wrong. Their actions – even if motivated by a need for self-defense – are often evil: cruel and unthinking and based on vengeance. but as authoritarian as the Israeli regime is, I see it as very much preferable – for people of ALL faiths and ALL ethnicities and backgrounds – to any current Arab regime.

Still, Israel in 2020 is no bastion of liberty, and nowhere close to a libertarian society, much less a minarchist government. Like all mandatory governments, the Israeli government does many evil things.

One of those areas of evil actions was reported several years back, featured in Freedom Net Daily. It still should rankle lovers of liberty:

Israel: Regime Orders Evangelical GOD TV Off Air (from NDTV [India]) “Israel’s media watchdog said Sunday that it had withdrawn the broadcast licence from US-based evangelical network GOD TV, accusing it of seeking to target Jews with Christian content. International Christian network’s GOD TV launched its Shelanu (Hebrew for ‘ours’) channel at the end of April [2020] on Israeli cable provider Hot, describing it as catering to Christians. But the channel provoked an immediate outcry in Israel, with then-communications minister David Amsalem accusing it of being a ‘missionary channel’ seeking to convert Jews to Christianity. … Israel enjoys vigorous support from evangelical movements in the United States but keeps a lid on missionary work in the Holy Land. While Israeli law only expressly forbids the giving of money or gifts to encourage conversions to another religion, missionary activities in general are closely monitored by the authorities and are offensive to many Israelis.”

Israel is NOT a monoreligious state, but it certainly has an oddity in the 21st Century. A state religion – Judaism – which has direct ties with, and some control over, the “secular” government of the State of Israel. (Even more so, if officially so, than Utah!) While far from a theocracy (a government in which priests rule), there is no First Amendment in Israeli basic law, protecting freedom of speech and religion in the way that Americans have.

And in this matter, the Israelis of 2020 very closely resemble those of AD 30-40, which will be discussed in detail in the second part of this commentary.

Israel today is an integral part of the post-WW2 international order built and maintained by the FedGov, even while it is frequently at odds with various administrations in DC and not a “formal” ally in many ways. And despite its oddities. Traits that make it in many ways at odds with American values (or at least those claimed to be “American”.) At the same time, its existence has been a constant flashpoint, for more than half a century.

Israelis – or at least most of their politicians and military leaders – understand both the value of the special relationship with DC and how far they can push. As they also understand that the wrong moves – or stupidity on one or both sides – can suddenly end that. Just as happened in the First Century AD.

But no one who is a lover of liberty should ever see Israel, and the Israeli “questions” as one dimensional. Whether they are haters of Israel (for whatever reasons – and there are many) or supporters. In our work of promoting, protecting, and expanding liberty, the Israelis can be valuable allies AND dangerous enemies.

Unlike their bitter and dogmatic enemies, the Islamic world, the Ummah. Whether those Muslims are Arab or Iranian or Pakistani. Whether they are Sunni or Shia or something else. Whether they are Islamists or “moderates.” Free speech? Freedom of assembly? Rights of the accused? Please.

Don’t misunderstand – a Muslim can be a lover of liberty also. But such Muslims are few and far between. As societies and cultures and nations, Islamic people are bitter and vengeful enemies not just of Jews but of liberty. (A subject for another time.)

The more we understand Israel and its history, the better we can deal with both the benefits and the threats that Israel of 2020 presents to liberty. And there are both.

See part 2.

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Got free speech? Got liberty?

News headlines herald new and ongoing attacks on fundamental liberties. Sometimes by a celebrity, sometimes by a politician… (Yes, we know it is often hard to tell the difference.) But often by a lot of people. And of course the fundamental liberties that they attack are

Are these real? Or just hype? Clickbait?

It appears to be both. Looking at recent headlines and actually going beyond the first paragraph or two, many appear to be serious efforts to take freedoms away from the masses. But others are merely reporting some twisted little piece of legislation designed to satisfy donors and fringe constituencies. Or mad(cap) efforts to get a little more news coverage and five seconds on the nightly news.

Continue reading
Posted in Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Baker’s Dozen (TM) Ways to get rid of the States (or some of them)

You may have seen some of the current clickbait, telling you “These ten states will be empty by 2025” or “Everyone leaving these states” only to find out (again) that the click-bait headlines are never truthful, accurate, or really reflect the contents of the story. Whether in print or online.

But…

We find many different groups (not just the Woke and radical democrats) that want to get rid of the States and create a unitary government for America.

Continue reading
Posted in Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

War coming?

The times, the times they are a changing. That was a popular song back in the 1960s and 1970s during the war in Southeast Asia and upheavals in the States.

It has applied on and off since then. Today perhaps more than ever.

As we begin the month of August, we recall the “Guns of August” remind us of the outbreak of the Great War in Europe. Again, then, there were warnings of the upheaval to come, but no one had the slightest idea of the incredible bloodbath that flooded Europe for more than four years of declared war, much less the decades of bloody struggle that would result: the chaos in the German and the Austro-Hungarian Empires, the horrors of the fall of the Russian Empire and the revolutions and civil war, and more millions dead. Much less the rise of fascism in Italy, the National Socialists in Germany, and the Falange in Spain. Or the evils of the New Deal in the States.

Today we still live with the results of the evils triggered that long-ago day in the Balkans.

Right now, Stateside, we have hints of something which could very similarly blow up in our faces. And that of everyone in the world.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Deep state supreme?

Although Michael Rectenwald wrote this commentary a few days ago, before our (lying?) eyes saw Uncle Joe sitting in the (real?) oval office, he makes some very important points. He also comes to a conclusion – but perhaps a century (or more) late that the facts more than support.

The Republic is dead. The zombie corpse that replaced it under Wilson (if not Teddy or even earlier) has started to fall apart – limbs not just dragging but rotting apart.

And “our democracy” that supposedly replaced it? That, too, to continue the simile, has had its heart staked. Because it too was a fraud, a sham, a play-act that lulled any and all to their doom. And the doom of the authoritative and increasingly centralized empire that replaced the Republic.

Continue reading
Posted in Guest commentary, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Baker’s Dozen (TM) Quotes on bearing arms

This Baker’s Dozen is boiled down from several dozen quotes: note that not all of the quotes are from Founding Fathers and not all from so-called conservatives. Or libertarians.

The Second Amendment to the US Constitution does not give us the right to keep and bear arms. Nor is the right to do so limited just to law-abiding American citizens: it is a inherent human right that we have because we are made by, and in the image of, God the Creator.

  1. “An armed society is a polite society.” – Robert A. Heinlein
  2. “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms.” – Richard Henry Lee
  3. “The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” – Samuel Adams
  4. “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.” – Alexander Hamilton
  5. “A free people ought to be armed.” – George Washington
  6. “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.” – Thomas Jefferson
  7. “A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained in arms, is the best most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison
  8. “Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny, or in private self-defense.” – John Adams
  9. “I would like to see every woman know how to handle firearms as naturally as they know how to handle babies.” – Annie Oakley
  10. “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” – Benjamin Franklin
  11. “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.” – George Mason
  12. “The right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny.” – Hubert H. Humphrey
  13. “Civilian ownership of firearms is not only a constitutional right, but also a fundamental aspect of the American identity, rooted in our history, culture, and tradition.” – Ronald Reagan
Posted in Guest commentary, Nathan's Rants, Short Takes | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Socialism, tyranny, and local government San Francisco style

As her Democrat Party comrades and the media seek to convince us that dear Kammie is better than the Second Coming (the only possible successor to “the best American president ever”), let us take a look at some of her background.

Continue reading
Posted in Nathan's Rants | Leave a comment

A Baker’s Dozen (TM) Quotes of Geniuses on Liberty

We here at The Price of Liberty are far from geniuses.
But we know it is possible to learn a lot by reading and listening to people who are geniuses. Here are ideas from thirteen people most of us consider geniuses.
Not all geniuses love liberty – but those who do have some very important things to say.

Allan Bloom The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities, that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable, that removes the sense that there is an outside.

    Aldous Huxley So long as men worship the Caesars and Napoleons, Caesars and Napoleons will duly rise and make them miserable. Liberty, as we all know, cannot flourish in a country that is permanently on a war footing, or even a near war footing. Permanent crisis justifies permanent control of everybody and everything by the agencies of central government.

    Albert Einstein Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth. Nothing will end war unless the people themselves refuse to go to war. Never do anything against conscience, even if the state demands it. The world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it. Small is the number of them that see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts.

    Abraham Maslow I can certainly say that descriptively healthy human beings do not like to be controlled. They prefer to feel free and to be free.

    Arthur Schopenhauer We forfeit three-fourths of ourselves in order to be like other people.

    John Stuart Mill The only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs or impede their efforts to obtain it.

    Leo Tolstoy The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

    George Bernard Shaw All government is authoritarian; and the more democratic a government is the more authoritative it is; for with the people behind it, it can push authority further than any Tsar or foreign despot dare do.

    Rod Serling The ultimate obscenity is not caring, not doing something about what you feel, not feeling.

    Richard Feynman Theoretically, planning may be good. But nobody has ever figured out the cause of government stupidity – and until they do (and find the cure), all ideal plans will fall into quicksand.

    Simone Weil The real sin of idolatry is always committed on behalf of something similar to the State. Conscience is deceived by the social. Human history is simply the history of the servitude which makes men – oppressed and oppressors alike – the plaything of the instruments of domination they themselves have manufactured, and thus reduces living humanity to being the chattel of inanimate chattels. What a country calls its vital economic interests are not the things which enable its citizens to live, but the things which enable it to make war.

    Thomas Jefferson I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself. I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it.

    Will Durant Above all, the ruling minority sought more and more to transform its forcible mastery into a body of law which, while consolidating that mastery, would afford a welcome security and order to the people, and would recognize the rights of the “subject” sufficiently to win his acceptance of the law and his adherence to the state.

    Think on these things!

      Posted in Guest commentary, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

      Where we stand in mid-2024

      It is still only a few weeks into Anno Libertatus 248, and just 233 years ago, the following document (unmarked up, of course) was produced. With very high hopes.

      Today, the mark-ups show that document is increasingly “null and void.” Oh, everyone pays lip service to it, but really enforce it? Hardly. And as L. Neil Smith (and others) were fond of pointing out, it had no enforcement clause. Oh, we pretend that the Nine Nazgul (SCOTUS) enforce it. And every military member of the United States Armed Forces takes an oath or pledge to defend it. But then they go forth and act in violation of it – at the express order and with the permission of members of the Legislative and Executive Branches. Who also take such an oath.

      Continue reading
      Posted in Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment