A neat, short guest commentary by Ryan Stubblefield
Ryan was asked this question, by a hoplophobe: Since there are more people who don’t own guns than there are people who do own guns here in the States, why don’t those non-gunowners disarm their “fearful neighbors?” That way, “we can live in a safe society free from firearms…” right?
Brian’s response is classic:
We’ll make this simple. 1/3 of the population of the U.S owns guns.
That leaves a 2 to 1 ratio of people taking their guns, Yes?
Should be plenty, normally is.
None of you are armed. I am.
Come to my door, tell me you’re taking my guns.
I instantly shoot your neighbor in the face. This fast. Say, “Bam Bam!”
I let you walk away. Now, it’s 1 on 1.
Not good odds. Right?
Don’t forget, you came onto my property and threatened to steal my guns. I don’t go to prison when I shoot your neighbor in self defense.
You go to prison for a few years for trespassing and attempted larceny of a firearm.
I’m out, free. You’re in. Your neighbor is dead.
Now it’s none to 1.
How’s your plan working out?
A quick edit. Are you afraid of not being safe because of guns? Seems like you’re the fearful neighbor here.
I’m not afraid of anyone. Simply because I can better control my situations, guaranteeing my own safety. You possibly could not. Your post already has marked you as a victim of sorts.
Count our blessings! At least some God-given liberties are recognized in the US Constitution and are not subject to the popular votes of democracy. At least in most of the States.
Immigration and the United Kingdom
Starmer is (we hear and hope) toast. Even Amelia, that purple-haired cutie, thinks so. And she’s been working hard to see him gone. (Of course, he is dragging it out – he may still effectively be in power for months as an election is prolonged, even though he is no longer the “Labour Leader.”)
One of the main reasons that more and more Britons have had it “up to here” with Starmer is the Tranzi push for more and more immigration. Especially from the cess-pits of the world. England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland all seem inundated with “refugees” who seem intent on recreating in the British Isles the very conditions that supposedly caused them to flee their homelands.
Britons seem condemned to relive history, don’t they? The last few decades of massive immigration into England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland are a familiar theme in the last 2,000+ years of British history. Sure, there are some differences: many (not all, by any means) of the immigrants of the last half-century are from what were British possessions: part of the now-defunct third British Empire.
(Third? Yup. See the end note.)
Continue reading →