By Nathan Barton
In the last two commentaries, I discussed government and weeds.
In those, I raised the question of how government enforces laws, even without having any legitimate authority to do so. Laws which are supposed to protect people (especially children and stupid people). But laws which do NOT. Because these laws seldom really accomplish what ostensibly they set out to do.
Laws against weeds (whether noxious weeds in fields, yards, and roadsides; or marijuana) do not eliminate weeds, and they really do not control people being exposed to weeds. Laws which supposedly prevent murder do not. Laws which theoretically prevent fraud and theft do not. Instead, they simply give government power and money. They expand government and the parasites in government who live off of the rest of the people of the Fifty States.
(I wasn’t saying that weeds, or weed, are good. Or killing. Or theft and fraud. These things are bad for people.)
Continue reading
By Katja Swift and Ryn Midura
SCOTUS legalizes sports wagering nationally
By Nathan Barton
The WaPo reports that SCOTUS has overturned a federal law which has been on the books for a quarter-century, The law, supposedly to protect the ‘integrity of collegiate and professional sports, enacted in 1992, prohibited 49 states from authorizing betting on team sports such as football, baseball, basketball, and hockey.
Now, I do not gamble (on sports events or most other things; my gambling has to do with staying out of trouble or not, and accomplishing projects against bad odds, kind of like farmers and ranchers gamble on crops growing or livestock surviving. I believe that gambling on sports or elections or which way the chicken runs across the road is not morally right.
But I don’t see that government has any business, right, legitimate power, requirement, obligation, or legitimate reason to try and regulate betting money, matchsticks, m&m’s or cigarettes on team sports, individual sports, animal antics, weather, elections, or anything else. None, nada, zip. I also fail to see any excuse for government to attempt to do so by some strange clause in the US Constitution, or some sort of referendum or initiative or compact. Continue reading →