The 100th anniversary of the end of the Great War

By Nathan Barton

In just a few days, on 11 November 2018, we will observe the 100th anniversary of the armistice taking affect at 1100 hours (Central European War Time) of the eleventh day of the eleventh month, which “ended” the hostilities of the Great War. Which we now call the First World War.

Or did it?  The wholesale slaughter of soldiers and civilians along the Western Front pretty much stopped: although there are records of attacks and deaths occurring just minutes before the official end of hostilities, on the Western Front: that horrific area of destruction stretching from the Swiss Frontier all the way to the North Sea.  But fighting, wounding, and deaths continued for weeks and months, around the world.  In a bitter and terrible withdrawal, German Imperial troops pulled back, from those portions of France, Belgium, and Luxembourg which had been occupied during the war.  Dogged by vengeful French, British, and American troops.  And still further back, to east of the Rhein, giving up (at least temporarily) vast lands and vast numbers of people and resources.

The fighting and wounding and killing would continue around the world, but especially in Europe, for years and decades. Some historians simply call the Great War the First Phase of the Global War of the 20th Century. It ended with the collapse of three major empires (German, Austro-Hungarian, and Ottoman (Turkish), the transformation of one (Russian into Soviet), and the expansion of three: French, British, Japanese, and foundation of a fourth (American).

The Second Phase of the Global War included:

  • the Russian Civil War (which would last until 1923 or so) including the fighting in the Baltic states, Belarus, Ukraine, and Poland
  • the Greco-Turkish and other wars in Anatolia and the lower Balkan Peninsula, including the Armenian genocide, mass resettlements, and more
  • the wars and revolts and occupation of the rest of the Ottoman Empire, involving various Arab, British, and French forces
  • the first wars for control of Canaan (“Palestine”), which would continue into the Fourth and Fifth Phases
  • the wars of Japan for expanding control into the periphery of China
  • the reestablishment of the German Empire (Dritte Reich) with annexation of Austria, and various other expansions

These in turn led to the Third Phase, which included:

  • the Great Asian War between Japan and various warlords in China
  • the Second European War, between Germany and Italy and six nations of western Europe and ultimately the United States and most of the Western Hemisphere
  • the Great Patriotic War between Soviet Russia, Germany, and various allies on both sides
  • the Great Pacific War between Japan and a coalition of the US, UK, and various other allies

This phase ended the German Empire and the Japanese Empire, weakened the British and French, and again killed millions. The conquest of Germany and “liberation” of Italy (conquest), and their eastern European allies, and the surrender of Japan, in turn led to the Fourth Phase, between the winners of the various fronts of the previous Phase:

  • the subjugation of eastern Europe into satellites of the Soviet Union
  • the Arab wars, both internal and against Israel and various Western powers, in 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973 and since
  • the winning of the Chinese Civil War by the Mao-led Communists
  • the Korean Conflict and its half-century-plus ceasefire
  • the failure to expand Communism into Greece, Turkey, Persia, etc.
  • the expansion of Communist China into Tibet
  • the collapse of the British Empire
  • the transformation (considered a collapse) of the French Empire, including its loss of Indochina. (The entire series of Southeast Asian wars from 1948 to 1979 being a result)
  • the collapse of the Dutch, Portuguese, and Belgian Empires
  • the wars between various former parts of the British and other empires, including the Pakistani/Indian wars

However, the Fourth Phase ended with the collapse of the bi-polar world balance, because of the collapse of the Soviet Union and therefore of the Russian Empire, or at least its transformation.  The Fifth Phase, beginning in 1991, is often considered to extend into at least the first decade of the 21st Century, and included:

  • the internal wars (and external meddling) of the Balkans
  • the new independence of the Baltic and eastern European states
  • the overthrow of the Republic of South Africa and its possessions and allies
  • the renewed Islamic offensive war against the rest of the world, coupled with the usual internal Arab and other dar-al-Islam (lands of submission) wars

It is not a pretty sequence of events.

Many historians like to trace it back to the assassination of an Austrian Royal in Serbia. They place the blame (as did the propagandists of 1914 and since) on Imperial Germany. But, some do point out that it was really the intervention of the United States in a primarily European conflict that really produced the worst results. The 1918 Armistice was just a pause and rearranging the props.

So, can we really celebrate what  quickly led to more, massive war that killed even more millions? For most of a century?  That led to exponentially increasing the power of government – not just in the so-called totalitarian governments of national and international socialism, but in the entire world?

Not unless we learn and apply the lessons we can learn from that eleventh hour… in defense of liberty.

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Trump, Pittsburgh, and the royal presidency

By Nathan Barton

Well, actually, by Tom Knapp.  Tom beat me to the punch this morning or last night by writing an EXCELLENT commentary about the way that The Donald is being treated by politicians and others at all levels and on all sides for visiting Pittsburgh to meet with families of victims after the Synagogue killings.

Black Crown - ClipArt Best

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Birthright citizenship – a libertarian value?

By Nathan Barton

Wow, the Donald has a way of riling people, doesn’t he? His latest “gaff” seems to demonstrate he’s not lost any skill in angering and upsetting people.  And is willing to do so regardless of mere things like mass murder or upcoming invasions or elections.

(By the way, don’t think I’ve heard anyone call him “The Donald” for some time now.  Not even when they cuss about him.)

I am of course referring to his planned use of executive orders to get rid of that cherished American institution, birthright citizenship.

(Warning, I will no doubt tick off a lot of people. Be prepared.)

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Scary stuff for Hallowe’en

By Nathan Barton

A friend who publishes a weekly column addresses several items this week, including the insane behavior of public schools and governments regarding the sex of students Russian government officials stating that Russia is “preparing for war,” and the impact of Hallowe’en on children.
All of these are issues of interest for lovers of liberty. They are all potentially scary. So, welcome to our Halloween article!
Schools and “gender” – Despite both religious and scientific evidence to the contrary, the former Bruce Jenner and a large contingent of educators and the Media elite are pushing the memes that it is “preposterous” and “unscientific” to link gender to sex at birth, Certain Hollywood types are pushing the propaganda that gender is nothing more than a “social construct.” Recently, a couple of teachers in Florida are being taken to task by their superiors because they refuse to allow a female student to shower with male students.
Is it not amazing that the government and schools give us more and more reasons to keep as many children as possible out of government-run, tax-funded schools?
It is more accurate to call it government-RUINED, theft-FUNDED schools.  Even if you do not agree with me that ALL taxes are theft, when the taxes are collected for supposedly ONE purpose (teaching children) and used for another (corrupting or propagandizing and therefore abusing children), is not “theft” an appropriate description?
I realize that many parents are completely incapable of teaching their children how to read, write, and do even basic arithmetic.  But the government schools are failing to do this more and more often – this should come as no surprise, since the teachers and faculty are (at least “officially”) unable to tell the difference between boys and girls.  That sort of stupidity pollutes the entire education process and system. When you couple that with all the other indoctrination/propaganda/lies/myths that the educrats promote, it is no wonder that children are abused.
Indeed, when you trace it back, it is easy to see why many modern parents are incapable of teaching their children anything.  They themselves were not taught much, if anything.
What can be done?  Churches COULD step up, and start teaching children (AND their parents) the basics of how to read – starting with the Bible, of course.  And how to write and act in a moral, ethical way: therein is the need for math and other things.  So could voluntary associations – elders working together, for instance. Other voluntary groups – Kiwanis and Lions and such could help intellectually as well as physically. The many good teachers trapped in the government system could begin working (basically underground) outside of school time to teach the truth. Give up on GRTF schools, please.
Russia Scared, or FedGov Scared? With nuclear non-proliferation and arms reduction agreements being voided, first by the FedGov and then by Russia, there is fear that a new arms race will ensue and Russian cruise missiles will be built and target the Fifty States.
This fear is the kind we see in hoplophobes and hoploclasts, and it is bogus.
Since the US has withdrawn from the treaty, Russia is no longer limited, and neither is the FedGov.  Many Americans have long advocated (from bitter experience) that the best way to prevent war is to be PREPARED for war.  So Amis and the Russians agree, right? With honest, clear communications in both ways, Russia is no more likely to throw cruise missiles and ICBMs at the Fifty States than the USAF and USN is likely to throw them at Russia.
Is this not something else we can “thank” Obummer and Clinton for? Their insane treatment of Russia (and the continued panic of Democrats over how supposedly Russia stole the election of 2016 for Trump) is paying dividends in supporting inherent Russian paranoia.  And the deep state (in alliance with those two and so many others such as Reid, Pelosi, etc.) seem to be dictating the Trump administration’s responses and actions in dealing with Russia. Fear is a tool of government.
Seems to me freedom and live-and-let-live makes sense:  no different than two neighbors that have problems with each other.  Don’t disarm – just keep your guns at home and go out and talk to each other peaceably and with a willingness to resolve the issues in calmness. Avoid taking aggressive action against each other, but be prepared to defend yourself. Being at peace with each other does NOT require disarming, whether it is private people OR nations.
Hallowe’en and children – My correspondent doesn’t like Hallowe’en.  Not for the usual “gasp, a pagan holiday!” response we hear so much.  Rather, she wants us to think about what we are teaching and exposing children to: scenes of horror that cause fear even in adults.  It is a good point: we don’t let children grow up until they are in their 20s, yet we intentionally expose them to things that terrify even adults.
Hallowe’en, like much else in modern society, has changed a lot in the last 40 or so years.  Like so much else, Halloween’s observance has become a disgusting mixture of human immorality – much different than what was common in the 1950s and 1960s. Dressing up as “Casper the Friendly Ghost” or Roy Rogers or a fireman is far different than the modern, Friday the Thirteenth, Freddy Kruger, Nightmare on Elm Street type haunted-houses and such we have today. Parents have liberty to choose what to teach and expose their children to, but do we not need more self-responsibility for what we do to our children?  Liberty is not suitable for people who refuse to accept responsibility for their own actions, and that includes their role in childraising.
Like educating them in general, parents must take control of what society and especially what outside agencies (government, churches, and more) do to (“for”) their children. Otherwise, they (and society) reap the consequences of their failure to do so.
Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Liberty and Authority

By Nathan Barton

I’ve forgotten who said this:

“And here is the difference between the Libertarians and the Authoritarians: the latter have no confidence in liberty; they believe in compelling people to be good, assuming that people are totally depraved; the former believe in letting people be good, and maintain that humanity grows better and better as it gains more and more liberty. If Libertarians were merely to ask that liberty be tried in any one of the other fields of human expression they would meet the same opposition as their pioneer predecessors; but such is their confidence in the advantages of liberty that they demand, not that it be tried in one more instance only, but that it be universally adopted.”

It is a frequent topic of discussion on-line, and in various political venues. It is a matter which crosses over into religious questions as well, and into parenting and business management. Let’s discuss at least one part of this.

Continue reading

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is democracy a bad idea?

By Nathan Barton

Too many people laud and honor the formerly United States of America and its Federal Government as being a “democracy.” This error goes back generations.  Those politically-minded may recall that the Founding Fathers pretty much despised the entire concept of “democracy.” They considered it a devolution of a republic eventually ending in tyranny and dictatorship.  If, indeed, a democracy was not already a tyranny of the majority.

Let us explore this idea for a moment, with the help of a couple of recent news stories. As we near the 2018 elections, both for officeholders and for ballot issues, it is worth some discussion. Is democracy really what we want? Or is it yet another bad idea for government? Continue reading

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | 9 Comments

What should the government own?

By Nathan Barton

I recently found this fascinating quote.

I don’t see any justification for the federal government owning land, other than the Statue of Liberty and maybe a few parks, maybe a few refuges. But to just own land to do nothing with it I think is a disservice to the Constitution. – Don Young

Continue reading

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Supreme Court – worth fighting and fussing about?

By Nathan Barton

Eric Holder, that wonderful paragon of government service “to the people” and incredible example of strict adherent of the rule of law, has condemned the Nazgul, questioning the body’s legitimacy in the wake of adding Kavenaugh to its august membership. His attack is echoed by thousands of other talking heads. Among other things, it seems the first bill which will be introduced by the inevitably Democratic-majority House of Representatives will be to impeach the man. Based on what might, by then, be all of twelve or thirteen weeks of work.  Work which is unlikely to have resulted in a single SCOTUS decision, based on their usual schedule.

Others have declared the “death” of American democracy, the demise of the Supremes as a viable institution, and worse.  Mobs continue to roam the halls and streets of DC, seeking victims for their ire.  Once again, it seems that the world is doomed.

(To listen to the screams of protest, I wonder if progressive women are not hurriedly getting pregnant so that they can enjoy another cycle of rite by getting an abortion before he locks up their uterus.)

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Political theater, at its worst

By Nathan Barton

It has been virtually impossible, for the last two weeks, to NOT have to hear something about the popular daytime (and nighttime) political soap opera starring Kenneth Branagh – whoops, sorry – Brett Kavanaugh, with its cast of thousands.

  Jonathan Baz Reviews...: July 2013

Next Nazgul?

Continue reading

Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Free people do not get permission

Nathan’s note: Mama Liberty (Lady Susan) and I both have four fingers pointing back at us in this commentary, at least for our professions in the past. Because she had retired from the profession of nursing, she had freed herself. Because I still (attempt to) practice engineering and provide certain kinds of training in various of the Fifty States, I am still not free in the sense we discuss here.

Free people do not go to the State to get permission to pursue a profession.

They simply pursue the profession….

Free men and women aren’t required to submit to mandatory government in order to earn the right to use their God-given talents and abilities.

They simply use those God-given talents and abilities.

Continue reading

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments