By Nathan Barton
Both Mike and “Slave Larry” make some excellent observations about privacy, tracking, and stores – and as Mama Liberty pointed out, all the others who can use that data being collected. (see the commentary “Cashless society and privacy.”
Larry, there are several ways that your friend could have gotten that message from Dollar General. They are not all totally invasive of privacy, but they can be.
First, she probably had the DG app on her phone. In installing that app, almost certainly she voluntarily allowed them to collect her location data – that is, to track her whereabouts. It may have been Bluetooth that connected: it may also have been the store’s wifi hotspot. (More on that in a moment.)
If she didn’t have the DG app, she very well may have had her phone set to automatically detect and connect to a wifi hotspot, like more and more stores have. Again, that is an option she can select (or turn off), which is designed to improve reception, save data usage, and – frankly – share info that can be mined from your phone. Continue reading



Philadelphia – demonstrate brotherly love by making crime easier for the disadvantaged to commit
By Nathan Barton
Thanks to Scott for passing this one on.
Information Liberation (seriously, that’s the website’s name!) tells us that Democrats who are “people of color” (and their allies and supporters and instigators) are demanding that bulletproof Plexiglas barriers in stores must be removed as they are demeaning and disrespectful to the majority African-American population of the city.
Indeed, a law mandating their removal has already been approved by a City Council committee.
These barriers are installed in shops and stores in high-crime areas, to protect clerks from physical attack (including being shot, stabbed, and grabbed and pulled over the counter by robbers) and to protect items for sale from being stolen. Continue reading →