By Nathan Barton
Recently, a popular conservative political website interpreted a recent article published by the American Psychiatric Association to say that one in four – 25% – of Americans are mentally ill. Although not explicit, I can see why they would take the statement that a quarter of all primary care patients have mental illnesses (conditions) even though only a third of those are actually diagnosed. Since (theoretically and officially) virtually all of us are “primary care patients” (we see a doctor, PA, or nurse about something now or then, even if just a check-up or a flu shot), the one-in-four number rings true.
And consider: unlike real medical doctors, psychiatrists and psychologists do not have the entire human race as their potential source of patients. (That is, people who they are paid to serve.) It is only people who have mental (including emotional) problems that are their natural prey (excuse me, natural supporting population). And even then, they have to compete with religious guides: preachers and rabbis and imams and “pastors” and others. Much more serious competition than chiropractors and herbalists and holistic practitioners. Continue reading

Redefining the media
By Nathan Barton
Whether we call it the “press” or the “media” or lump it together in the general category of “free speech,” most people (both in the Fifty States and much of the rest of the world) consider their freedom to be important.
Important, as far as being an essential part of human freedom. “Although I disagree with what you are saying, I will defend your right to say it.” Free speech was both a recognized right (first of Englishmen and then of Americans) AND nearly the first freedom which dictators and tyrants attempt to snatch.
There has long been a odd set of relationships between government and, first newspapers, later radio and television. Newspapers are, by their very nature, political. Radio and television became even more political. Media, like any other invention of mankind, can be used for good or for bad; it can be used to promote liberty or to control others.
There are, in my opinion, three types of “media” or “press” or even “free speech.” Continue reading →