The Federal Government “owns,” without Constitutional authority, much of the Fifty States – and oddly enough, far more of many of those states than it claims in the District of Columbia, the ONLY place it is authorized to own anything beyond military installations and postal and customs offices. One of the agencies which administers probably the largest part of that government land is the United States Forest Service, which controls 10 percent of the land in the Fifty States. And does a VERY bad job of administering (caring for) that land.
Independence Institute published an interesting article this week.
Taking an Ax to Traditional Forest Management
It talks at length about the problems with the USFS, and a little about WHY there are the problems, and then suggests creating “Charter Forests” the way “Charter Schools” have been established in many school districts in recent years.
That was very close to a concept I first offered to the voters of South Dakota when I ran for governor in 1994 (when I was young and REALLY stupid). South Dakota (unlike most of the West) only has parts of TWO national forests (and parts of three National Grasslands), but they take up a sizable chunk of the state, and the economy is impacted for both good and bad for the 130 years we’ve had them here.
My proposal was to “commercialize” these. (Not “privatize” because that has come to mean do things the government (stupid) way, just have a contractor do that instead of having government employees be stupid. The worst of two worlds.) I modified the proposal somewhat by specifying that it had to be non-profits and not for-profit companies, and that the companies be cooperatives so that there was a LOT of public participation. But the concept was simple: let the land remain in “federal” or “state” ownership, but operating them: managing and caring for them, would be in the hands of this non-profit cooperative association that would break-even and provide the materials and services to its members and to the general public.
The contract or agreement between the USFS (or USDA, its parent) and the State of South Dakota and the cooperative association would specify the objectives, goals, and limits – BUT NOT THE METHODS OF ACHIEVING THOSE things – and some form of insurance or surety would be maintained (just like mining companies and landfills do) to protect against negligence and gross (that is, governmental-level) stupidity. The association would be freed from the six or eight levels of “supervision” that the current Forest/Grassland Supervisors in Custer and Fort Pierre and Bison and such “enjoy.” (Think about the heirarchy: makes the Roman Catholic Church look flat: District Ranger, Forest Supervisor, Regional Supervisor, Chief of the USFS, Deputy Undersecretary, Undersecretary, Secretary of Agriculture, and of course, the MAN in 1600 PA.)
This is indeed similar to the proposal for charter forests now launched by Independence Institute, and they will no doubt be listened to much better than I was two decades ago. Both of us point out that something HAS to be done. The continued federal ownership of land that SHOULD have remained in ownership of tribes or gone into private ownership, and the government mismanagement of that for 120 years, has damaged the forests severely: more so than the so-called ravages done before the forest reserves were created except in a VERY few locations. But worse, the current conditions of the forests of America, especially those of the West, means that much of the destruction we’ve seen is only a pale shadow of what will happen with the economy and federal government collapse, and there will be only enough “federal management” to keep anyone from doing anything about the longterm decay in ecosystems, and the massive fires sure to sweep so much of the forests.
Local, private management is the only alternative which is both able to accomplish the objective of managing the forests to support humans (and wildlife and everything else), that is both sustainable and affordable. The same system could be applied to the National Park lands, and to the vast lands controlled by another of the great failed bureaucracies, Interior’s Bureau of Land Management.
By the way, this is NOT a totally outlandish or new idea by any means. Forests both in the United Kingdom and the Fifty States nave been privately owned and operated for centuries, and can be visited today. They are not utopias, but they are sustainable and thriving. In the US, look at much of the Eastern Seaboard, especially Maine and Pennsylvania, but in the West, look at the land owned by Union Pacific, BNSF, and other railroads, as well as millions of acres of “inholdings” inside national forests. It DOES work.
Mama’s Note: Might be a “step in the right direction, as so many like to say. The real answer, of course, rests on reverting all this land to private property, controlled by individuals with the rational incentives, rewards and punishment of the free market. The “non-profit” works fine as long as it is administered by saints and watched closely by everyone involved – which doesn’t happen much in the real world, and certainly not on the logistic and economic scale of that much land and it’s resources.
Libertarian Commentary on the News, #14-03D: This and that
Theft by government – Congress in action
McClintock: $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill ‘Moves Our Country in the Wrong Direction’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: In other words, no change in the situation from the last couple dozen budgets and spending bills. The nation continues to go to perdition in a pushcart. But probably at a faster rate, of course.
Government-ruined, Theft-funded schools – The “messiah’s” minions
Prediction: Racial Quota for School Discipline Will Aggravate Zero Tolerance
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Clearly Holder and his bosses and thugs don’t think that the FedGov had ENOUGH control over the “public” schools and is going to push more. And clearly, he is hoping for a backlash to give and EXCUSE for even more control. Presumably, this will allow the DoJ to flush out the few remaining non-liberals in the school systems, and to create databases that will track students from pre-school on – for life.
Congress in action – No more liberty
Sen. Rand Paul: ‘You Name It, Your Freedom of Choice Is Gone’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Yes, he is right. But he still seems to be willing to make compromises to give up a little more here, a little more there, and of course, the other 99 members of the Senate also seem happy to do so. I admit, Paul is pushing more than most, but he will be even more ineffective with the loss of Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, who is resigning two years early, perhaps in the hope that a new Senator elected from Oklahoma in 2014 will be a firebrand willing to push for a decade plus of quasi-libertarian actions in the Senate. But I wouldn’t count on it.
The “messiah” – Rule by imperial edit
Obama Says He Won’t Wait for Legislation: ‘I’ve Got a Pen and I’ve Got a Phone’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Yes, and a whole lot of guns and panzers and drones… We (supposedly) elect a man who has severe personality and security and power issues, give him what seems like unlimited power, and then we wonder why he turns into another Nero or Caligula, and treats even other members of government like trailer trash.
Culture wars: killing babies
Study: Contraceptive Use, Multiple Partners Linked to Higher Rate of Abortion
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: This study seems to be linking things that aren’t necessarily connected in the way they are trying to claim. And making statements that are obvious. I see it as a moral issue: people who have the morals of an alley cat are likely to demonstrate in various ways: multiple partners and “eating” their own children. And since many religious groups shun contraceptive use as it is immoral, even that can be seen as related. And we also have a factor of intelligence: if anyone is stupid enough to kill their own child, is it a surprise that they are probably too stupid to TAKE the contraceptives properly, as well?
Politics 2014
Gov. Christie: ‘I Am Ultimately Responsible’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: A surprising admission – and one which obviously makes him unsuited and unqualified for either the elective office he now holds, or any other office. Seriously, this guy had already proved himself to be a politician that we want in higher office almost as little as the current squatter. But people are asking the obvious: why did the media suddenly turn on a liberal that they had been grooming for several years? What is there about him that set off their alarm bells? And how much further is this going to go?
Cop thuggery – Self-defense
Florida Man in Maryland: How did Cops Knew he had a CCW?
(Tampa Tribute via Personal Freedom) – A Florida man was traveling South with his family on the way home from a wedding in New Jersey when the Maryland Transportation Authority Police (MTAP) began tailing his Ford Expedition. After about 10 minutes, the police pulled him over and told him they knew he owned a gun. They demanded he produce it for them on the spot — even though the firearm was locked away in a safe 1,000 miles away.
Nathan: Welcome to the Police State, Mr. Filippidias. Yes, the big question here is HOW did the Maryland state thugs in their unmarked car know he had a concealed carry weapons permit from Florida? But there are other issues, especially with the man’s wife, who was stupid enough to blab nonsense to the cops, and so won the family two hours of misery that SHOULD result in a hefty settlement in a court. And why is the MTA so panicked about a CCW that they pull this kind of stupidity? And about THIS family? What twisted pattern of “logic” went through this cop’s mind?
It is this sort of thing that compels me to stay out of the Northeast as much as possible. For someone from Florida, he probably needed the weapon to protect him and his family MORE in Jersey and Maryland and vicinity than he does in Florida. But he disarms himself and still gets in trouble for it. Still, one of the main points to remember is that families need to talk. Often.
Congress in action
Congress Wants More Potatoes in WIC Program
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Because lobbyists and voters want more? Or because the parasites (not saying that some people on WIC are NOT really in need) want more? Why put a food item in the program? Usually, because you can sell more of it, increase demand, and thereby raise (or maintain) prices. The same reason that so many other foods are commodities to be issued or purchased with SNAP and the like: cheese, powdered milk, and raisins all come to mind.
Mama’s Note: If this is limited to fresh, whole potatoes, I doubt they’ll move many of them. Many people, especially the “poor,” have little or no idea how to cook common, whole foods and rely on instant, packaged, prepared and frozen things – or fast food “takeout” almost exclusively.
Congress in action
Women are wielding notable influence in Congress
(Washington Post) After decades of trying to amass power, several women have vaulted to the top of influential congressional committees, putting them in charge of some of the most consequential legislation being considered on Capitol Hill.
Nathan: Leave it to the WaPo to publish an article that presents the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, and Olympia Snow as part of a downtrodden minority desperately struggling for recognition and a seat at the table, instead of the powerful, corrupt, lying, thuggish powermongers that they are.