We are going through this incredible, hourly, “guns are evil” business on the news and in the legislatures, and so I’ve dedicated this commentary pretty much to self-defense and other uses of guns, and those who hate and fear them.
Self Defense
Wisconsin: Grandmother halts robbery with her gun
(WISN) Ernestine Aldana owns a grocery store near the corner of Muskego Avenue and Becher Street in Milwaukee. On Dec. 14, Aldana was working in the store when a man entered the store and pulled a knife on her. “I was really scared,” she said. But as the man reached for cash from the drawer, Aldana pulled a gun from underneath the counter.
Nathan: Reported by Townhall and the WISN television station, with video! This sort of thing very seldom hits any major news media. She didn’t have to fire a shot – so no record will be maintained of this by any official agency: one of hundreds of times a day people use (but don’t “use”) weapons to defend themselves, their property, their families and friends and communities. Even while DC and, no doubt, much of the Wisconsin legislature works feverishly to steal away her tools to defend herself.
Self-defense:
Casper, Wyoming: Gun Carrying Employee Thwarts Attempted Hotel Robbery
(K2, Casper) A hotel clerk with a gun may have thwarted a robbery Friday morning (January 4th). Investigators say just before 1:00 AM, two African American males entered the Quality Inn at the corner of North Poplar and F Streets in Casper, with their faces concealed. One of the suspects told the clerk it was a hold-up, making a gun gesture with his hand. The clerk then pulled a gun from her lunchbox and pointed it at the suspects, who then fled.
Nathan: Folks, this is CASPER, not some shot-up suburb of Detroit or some drug-ridden neighborhood of Chicago or Denver. I ASSUME that there were one or two Casper cops and maybe a sheriff’s deputy or two on duty at that time of night and NOT out trolling for drunk drivers heading home from a bar. But they could not have responded quickly enough to keep the hold-up from taking place and probably not to keep her from getting raped and/or killed as well. But this mealy-mouthed language of the TV station, even in Wyoming, turns my stomach: “may have thwarted” and “suspects.” And why she should have to keep her handgun in her lunchbox and NOT on her person is beyond me. (I know this is an old story, but worth commenting on with the others today.)
Mama’s Note: Casper has joined Cheyenne in trying to match Jackson Hole for liberal BS… and isn’t it a funny coincidence that these are the three largest cities? Not to mention that most of the “media” in Wyoming is controlled by people who don’t live here, so it’s pretty much like all the rest of the mainstream “news” garbage.
But yes, I was shocked at the mention of the lunch box. No idea in the world why she would carry like that, but my first thought was that someone needs to do some serious self defense training down there. No reason in the world why she can’t carry on her body as she should.
Self-defense
Casper, Wyoming: Customer Turns the Tables on Nail Salon Robber
Nathan: At least this K2 story is worded better! Guy’s got to be pretty stupid and pretty desperate to rob a nail salon. Especially with credit cards. (Or maybe that is what he was wanting – their credit cards. Compare this to the nail salon in Seal Beach, California, where only the killer was armed. And then consider how our beloved rulers in DC are going to protect us and the children…
Mama’s Note: This is an even older one, but it tickled me pink. And yes, it takes a special brand of stupid to even think of trying to rob anyone here in Wyoming. Hard to believe they wouldn’t quickly figure out how well armed we are, even if they have just come from Chicago.
Hoplophobes and Hoploclasts
Lawyer: Banning Assault Weapons A Feel-Good Gesture ‘Unless You’re Prepared to Confiscate’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: How many dead Americans will we put up with to “stop gun violence?” Ten thousand? Fifty thousand? A hundred thousand? A million? Of course, a lot of those will be cops and bureaucrats: wonderful people like code inspectors and firefighters and emergency medical personnel and utilities workers. And a lot will be the children who live in the homes where the cops and their support personnel are entering to “protect the children” by stealing their parents’ and grandparents’ weapons.
Mama’s Note: Not to mention all of those police, sheriff’s deputies and other officials who might have been protected or assisted by armed individuals… who now will not be willing to risk doing so in the future. That’s already happening, I’m sure, since that’s clearly being discussed on a number of gun owners websites I visit. And that is without any “ban” or “confiscation.”
Hoplophobes and Hoploclasts – The “messiah’s” chief minion
Biden Compares Gun Control to Car Air Bags: ‘We’re Saving Lives’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Seems to me that guns save a LOT more lives than they take – it is the gun itself that should be compared to air bags, and NOT “gun control.” Indeed, why don’t the GOP and NRA types (who are statists) lobby for hard points in all new automobiles and trucks to allow the operator to put a holstered handgun convenient to reach for, as another “safety device” for cars? Maybe the patrol and cops should just assume that the driver and passengers are armed, rather than asking if they are (a violation of privacy, no?).
Mama’s Note: Let’s not use their distorted language, please. The guns neither save nor take any lives at all. The tool is a lifeless chunk of metal and plastic. Only a person can use a tool, either for good or ill.
Well, that works for most things, but “air bags” don’t depend on a person to use them… they can attack at any time all by themselves! And they can kill as easily as they can save. Statistically relevant… if the one in my car were to deploy, it would most likely kill me because I am five feet tall and must sit quite close to the steering wheel. The bag would go off right into my face, break my glasses and quite easily break my neck.
Our right to self defense
Wyoming legislators propose gun protection legislation
(K2 Radio) Several Wyoming lawmakers are proposing legislation designed to protect gun-owners from any potential federal firearm ban. The “Firearms Protection Act” bill, introduced this week, would make any federal law banning semi-automatic firearms or limiting the size of gun magazines unenforceable within the state’s boundaries. Anyone trying to enforce a federal gun ban could face felony charges under the proposal. It also includes a provision allowing the Wyoming Attorney General’s office to defend any state resident against any federal firearm ban.
Nathan: Assuming that they don’t mess it up, this is a good sign for people of Wyoming and nearby states. Of course, it might trigger an invasion by Colorado, fearful that Cheyenne and Laramie and Carpenter and Baggs might become centers of infection and smuggling, as the General Assembly and Hickenlooper apparently intend to outlaw “assault weapons” and Swiss Army knives (unless they are used ONLY to cut cured MJ leaves).
Mama’s Note: It’s been interesting just how many people have written to me about this, and are so excited. But as I’ve been explaining, it’s not really likely to pass – and would not likely be enforced if it passed. The state legislature last time almost had a nervous breakdown passing the new law repealing the necessity for CC “permits,” and it still might be reversed.
These are still politicians, mind you, and they do have their own agenda – and our rights are there at the very bottom of the list. Just 10 of the bills being considered:
HB0042: Land use planning: Abolishes state land use commission. Doesn’t abolish government meddling with land use, however.
HB0045: Fireman pension plan A: Limits taxpayers’ growing pension liability. Good, but will probably be defeated.
HB0069: Highway funding: The gas tax grab — need we say more. Very bad.
HB0077: Wyoming lottery: Creates a new lotto bureaucracy in the state. Very bad and super stupid.
HB0078: Budget review process: Would bring the entire Game and Fish and WYDOT budgets under the scope of the governor and legislature. Very bad.
HB0125: Interstate purchase of health insurance: authorizes insurers to offer individual and small employer health insurance policies in Wyoming. Jury is still out on this one. It’s a lame attempt to deal with the Obamacare insanity.
SF0023: Challenge loans for natural gas fueling infrastructure: Gives subsidized loans to businesses. Just what we need, more subsidies.
SF0031: Wyoming Veterinary Medical Practice Act: Require licensing euthanize animals. Stupid and bad.
SF0032: Game and fish license fees: Hikes license fees. Very bad. An almost doubling of the “license” and tag fees.
SF0052: Natural gas state vehicles: Forces state to purchase natural gas vehicles. Really stupid, and very expensive.
Our right to self-defense
Rep. Duncan on U.S. Gun Rights: ‘We Live In a Republic, Not a Dictatorship’(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Sorry, Representative Duncan, but it was a republic a century ago (before the Federal Reserve and Direct Election of Senators) but we’ve been a dictatorship with growing power for the last ten decades. It could be said to have ended before that: talk to LDS families whose relatives escaped to Mexico, to CSA veteran families in Mexico and Brazil, and to Cuban and Filipino families about 1898-1914. And then talk to German-American families in the Dakotas about 1917-1918, to Japanese-American families on the West Coast 1941-45, to people who don’t want pasteurized or homogenized milk, to midwives, to the veterans of Athens, TN in 1946, and a lot more people since then. There is no true republic here, and democracy is just one step in the direction of more tyranny.
Against our right of self-defense
Anti-Gun Groups At White House: Question Isn’t Whether New Gun Laws Would Have Prevented Newtown
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Of course not, the question is whether or not they can use Newtown (Sandy Hook) and the latest school shootings (no killings, at least) in California to come up with more laws to disarm more people and blacken anyone who isn’t in a uniform (or plainclothes) from having a gun (and only when actually on duty). It isn’t about “guns” it is about “control.”
Commentary
The Real Root of School Violence – by Tom DeWeese
(FREEDOM’S PHOENIX)
Thanks to MamaLiberty for this: Some of her thoughts: [DeWeese was a gung ho supporter of Bush and the various “wars on terror” then and I just didn’t want any. No idea if he’s changed much. Don’t see his stuff published often. Anyway, he pretty well hits this one out of the ballpark.
Nathan: DeWeese has put together some very interesting data and history and come up with 2+2+4 here. This is certainly in line with a lot of the questions about drug prescriptions for various “syndromes” raised in the past few weeks. But I think it is MORE than just this: a whole lot of different factors have led to this current situation, including declining responsibility, morality, and increasing government control in far more than just psychology and ADHD. Keep in mind, we are on the THIRD GENERATION of children educated by the system DeWeese describes.
Mama’s Note: Oh, absolutely! There is much more than the drugs involved here, but they all sort of feed into and require each other. And one of the most terrible things to come out of it, regardless of whether or not these kids ever “go postal,” is the fact that the men come out of the “schools” seriously emasculated as well. The people of this country will have a terrible price to pay for this – or at least the survivors.
Self Defense?
CA: Teacher talks student out of high school shooting
(BBC News) “A teacher at a high school in California has been praised by police for averting a serious shooting incident. The teacher and a campus supervisor talked a gunman into putting down his weapon after he had shot and injured one pupil at Taft Union High School. Police said the gunman had enough ammunition to kill many people. The injured student was taken to hospital in an air ambulance and is in a critical condition.” (01/10/13)
Mama’s Note: I can hear it now… Oh, we can just talk these people into not shooting… This teacher is very, very lucky to be alive.
Nathan: That actually is already being said: that teachers should be trained in this and NOT in self-defense using a weapon. This would-be killer used a shotgun, how convenient to add it to the list of forbidden weapons for the Chief Minion’s committee.

Libertarian Commentary on the News #13-03A Defense and Not – Our Nannies
NOT Self Defense
Texas: Robbery victim wants to thank Good Samaritans who came to his rescue
(KHOU-TV) Kevin Dorsey says he hadn’t even closed his car door Thursday night when a man wearing all black and a ski mask put a gun to his chest. The man took Dorsey’s wallet, cell phone and car keys. After he was robbed, Dorsey began running down the street and says two men in a Mercedes asked him what had happened. Dorsey told them and they not only caught up with the suspect, but they started shooting at him. The suspect fired back. In the end, the two witnesses turned vigilantes won and took down the bad guy.
Mama’s Note: From this report, the robbery victim was not in danger, he was fleeing when the two idiots intervened. They shot first, becoming the aggressors. While I’m glad the criminal was caught, and the man’s property returned (maybe), this sort of vigilantism is exactly the sort of thing to keep the gun grabbers in an uproar. Maybe they can get away with it in parts of Texas… but probably not anywhere else.
Nathan: For once, TV news correctly uses the word “vigilante” – if the story is accurate. Even in Texas, the robbers could easily find a lawyer to file a suit against the two men. If the robber had fired at them first, it is a different matter, of course. Especially in our current climate, it is important that we do not go off and do something that smacks of taking the law into our own hands. But the other lesson to learn from this is to avoid the stupidity that Dorsey exhibited: obviously he was NOT aware of his surroundings, he had left his door unlocked so that someone could get in, he fled in obvious panic, and he was himself unarmed. The “vigilantes” could just as easily have been two MORE robbers, seeking whatever he had left!
Self Defense – Mexican civil war/War on some drugs
Armed vigilante groups policing 2 Mexican towns
(AP) — Several hundred civilians have taken up arms in two towns in a southwestern Mexico state and are arresting people suspected of crimes and imposing a curfew, leading authorities to promise to reinforce security forces in the area. People wearing ski masks or bandanas and carrying small arms this week began manning checkpoints on roads into the municipalities of Ayutla de los Libres and Teconoapa in Guerrero state’s Costa Chica area about 75miles (120 kilometers) southeast of the Pacific resort of Acapulco. Leaders said they were acting against crime and insecurity.
Mama’s Note: So, of course the government is going to send in more cops and soldiers. What could go wrong?
Nathan: Of course, under Mexican law, every one of these people are criminals, perhaps more so than those they are trying to arrest. I’ve read predictions that the new Presidente will negotiate out a deal with the cartels that will in essence end most of the violence but make the cartels part of the government, and where will these people end up? Efforts to legalize gun ownership for self defense, like that at Colonia Le Baron near El Paso, are seemingly doomed to fail, especially with the new gendarmerie -which is a perfect place to put all the cartel’s gunsels, of course. With so large a number of people involved, you wonder at the politics that keeps the towns from doing anything. Have the local alcaldes and policia been disbanded, are so corrupt, or simply do not exist? (Wikipedia states: “Some of the municipalities of Mexico have their own preventive and municipal police forces, which are responsible for handling minor civil disturbances and traffic infractions. Of the 2,395 municipalities, 335 have no police forces. However, some of the municipal forces are large and important.”)
Perverts and stupid people/cops
Saco man accused of peering up skirts using shoe camera
(kjonline.com) A Saco man was arrested Friday night for allegedly using a camera in his shoe to take photographs up women’s skirts and dresses at the Walmart store in Scarborough in July. William Tibbals, 31, of Pepperal Street, was charged with a felony count of visual sexual aggression against a child under 12 and multiple counts of violating privacy.
Mama’s Note: How stupid to call the police. Someone needed to step on the shoe/camera, say,”oh, pardon me,” and walk away. Rinse, repeat if necessary. Why is everything a police matter? I do have to wonder just how many women there wear skirts, especially this time of year. Can’t imagine he was seeing much anyway. Stupid twit.
Nathan: His activities were in July at the WalMart, according to the story. That time of year, in most WalMarts, why would he need a shoe camera? The skirts are so short that there isn’t much hidden – assuming that they are wearing underwear at all. A couple of months ago when Debby quietly remarked to a young woman acquaintance (no lady, obviously) who bent down to pick something up and revealed her underwear to the people on the public sidewalk that she was giving a free show, the retort was “well, it isn’t anything they haven’t already seen.” This from a freshman in college. And with modern women’s “popular” underwear (you’ve seen that joke picture about “Proof of Global Warming” with underwear up on a clothesline, haven’t you?), you might be amazed at what could be seen. Yes, the solution would have been for the mother of the 12-year-old to do just what you suggest. The appropriate response, to have slapped or punched out the pervert and then smashed the (toe, presumably) of the shoe and lobbed it somewhere in the store, and then announce to the nearest dozen or so people that a pervert has been caught, and then have store security call an ambulance. But that would have surely given the pervert the opportunity to sue.
Mama’s Note: I didn’t notice the story was that old, actually. But I agree that there are a lot of half dressed females (and males, actually) in any city in warm weather. I’ve not seen nearly as much of that here as I did in So. Calif., but enough. And yes… for some weird reason, people go to WalMart in the most shocking stages of undress or violently inappropriate costume of all kinds.
As for the shoe cameraman… merely smashing the camera “accidentally” would be enough, I think. And calling for the store manager if he was stupid enough to protest.
I was talking with someone just the other day about self defense, and it came as a surprise to her to consider that the same tactics apply to all sorts of things besides some deadly encounter. We must protect ourselves, in appropriate ways of course, from every sort of assault and impropriety such as this. The vigilance and assertive behavior needed to ward off an attack is just as important, and probably just as effective, in warding off this sort of garbage. Can you imagine anyone being so blatant with his perversion if half the people in that WalMart had been openly armed? I think not.
Nanny State – War on some drugs
NYC: Bloomberg takes away hospital painkillers
(godfatherpolitics.com) New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced this week that the city is going to sharply restrict supplies of painkillers at the city’s emergency rooms to combat a rampant addiction problem. …“The city hospitals we control,” he said Friday in response to critics, “so … we’re going to do it and we’re urging all of the other hospitals to do it, voluntary guidelines. Somebody said, oh, somebody wrote, ‘Oh then maybe there won’t be enough painkillers for the poor who use the emergency rooms as their primary care doctor.’ “Number one, there’s no evidence of that. Number two, supposing it is really true, so you didn’t get enough painkillers and you did have to suffer a little bit. The other side of the coin is people are dying and there’s nothing perfect. … Come on, this is a very big problem.” This very big problem, according to Bloomberg, is that people with afflictions like broken bones are being prescribed more painkillers than they need, and that leads to them either getting addicted, selling the drugs on the street or giving them to kids to get high….“If you break a leg, you’re going to be in pain, nothing wrong with getting something that reduces the pain. But if you get 20 days’ worth of pills and you only need them three days, there’s 17 days sitting there. Invariably some of the kids are going to find them, or you’re going to take them and get you addicted.”
Nathan: Bloomberg is the epitome of the nanny-state elected dictator. Apparently crime is so bad that people are mugged going out of the pharmacy, for their meds? Maybe Bloomberg should just have everyone’s prescriptions turned over to the nearest police or fire station, so that the people needing their medicine can go and take it so that only the cops and firefighters can put the leftovers into the black market.
Mama’s Note: Bloomberg is simply one of the most arrogant and self deluded people I’ve ever seen in such a position. In any other situation, he’d be laughed off without a thought. It just doesn’t seem possible that enough people in NYC are really THAT gullible. But I guess it speaks for itself. They must be, or he wouldn’t be reelected.
The “messiah’s” minions – Freedom and federalism
White House: “Our States Remain United”
(WhiteHouse.gov)
Nathan: I agree with several commenters: condescending and patronizing. But then, what did we expect?
Mama’s Note: Well, what else could we expect? Sort of like telling the bloody, obviously abused woman that there is no divorce and she’d just better get used to being beaten. Well, when divorce is not “allowed,” there are other remedies. She’d just better not wait until the chains are locked on her wrists and she’s in the basement.
Nathan: Of course our nannies would not allow any of THEIR states to go out on their own into the big bad world. We must be protected…