[Continued from an earlier article] By Nathan Barton
Food stamps are a way to hide hunger:
Remember, the reason we DO NOT have soup lines today like in the First Great Depression is because they get their food from the same grocery stores as the rest of us, with the money magically transferred to their little plastic cards electronically. We don’t worry about what we don’t see: we don’t know whether that piece of plastic is a debit card, a credit card, or an EBT (welfare) cared.
Food stamps discourage personal action, in two ways:
For the hungry: “I don’t have to work: I may have to eat Ramen six days a week, but Uncle Sugar will pay for it, so I won’t starve.” Food Stamps are EASY, and without the personal embarrassment of standing in a line to beg a meal from a nice Salvation Army or Hope Mission lady, or even worse, having to listen to some prayer and sky-pilot shouting to get a meal.
For the not-hungry: Food Stamps discourage personal action by those who otherwise WOULD HELP fight hunger and feed the needy: “The government is paying them to eat, I don’t have to spend my time and my money (well, more of my money) since I’m paying taxes and the government is providing it. Out of sight, out of mind: we’d be far more bothered by seeing people in a soup kitchen line three times a day than even if the people getting EBT had to stand in line at the local welfare office outsiden where we could see them.
Food Stamps breed dependency:
And NOT just in those who get them, but in those who can shirk their christian (or other faith) responsibility to care for the hungry, because the government is doing it. And more dependency ON THE GOVERNMENT means more power TO the government. We ALL give up personal responsibility. And at the same time, liberty.
It even applies to the middlemen: to those who take from the “rich” and give to the “poor” – more taxes to collect, more people to collect them. And more businesses to take the stamps and provide the goods and services, at the same rate they sell to everyone else. More mouths to feed: more hands to feed them. More paperwork, more people and pens and computers. More fraud: more people to investigate and do the rituals to claim to control it. In the old days, if you were hungry, well, the Lord told the farmers to leave some of the harvest in the corners of the fields so that the poor and hungry could glean the fields. You had to WORK to eat – even if the food was “free” – not the “work” of filling out some forms and trudging down to the local welfare office. The hobo who begged for a meal from a housewife EXPECTED to do some work for it: painting a fence, chopping weeds, picking up trash. When the charity came from your local church (or a local church), YOU had to ask, and YOU had to justify why you couldn’t work and pay your own way – or at least part of it. And more likely than not, it wasn’t straightforward charity too: in those days people remembered Paul’s admonition: “if a man does not work, neither shall he eat.” Today, “if a man does not work, find a way to classify him as disabled or whatever and give him all you can.” So my last point:
Food Stamps make governments bigger and more powerful.
While there appear to be many factors in why there are such differences in states, I suspect that the KEY factor is the mental attitude of dependency versus personal responsibility. If I am in trouble, am I going to do something about it, or am I going to run to some government agency and demand that they take care of me? Too many Americans choose to do the second: their society, in places like DC and Oregon and Rhode Islan are BUILT around “government will take care of it.” Although food stamps are a measure and the result of this dependency, they are also a convenient, even attractive way, to increase dependency and be pulled from personal responsibility. Their governments were already bigger than most: increased food stamps mean bigger government. The Russian military have a phrase for it: Reinforcing success. Government WANTS and NEEDS more dependency, less personal responsibility, and to hide reality from those it controls. Food stamps fit perfectly.
COMMENT: Literally just minutes after I finished this commentary, I received the following link from a correspondent: Foodstamp Program Shutdown Imminent
It contains what looks like a real letter, dated 11 OCT 2013, from USDA FNS (Food and Nutrition Service) (which runs SNAP) to all state SNAP agencies telling them NOT to submit reports that are necessary to have funds transferred for food stamps for October. The people who saw this letter (who are in Utah) are fearful that this is an early warning that there will BE NO FOOD STAMPS in November, even if the “shutdown” is ended before then. Given lead times and other factors, this COULD be a possibility IF and ONLY IF the White House and their minions WANT IT TO HAPPEN. Apparently, FNS is one of the few (maybe the only) part of USDA deemed essential. As my analysis suggests, ending food stamps is NOT something that the current regime would want to do in the normal course of events: it presents the government as weak and ineffectual and encourages – nay, forces – people to start taking some more responsibility, and weakens their dependence on government. (The national park fiasco was NOT, for 99.5% of the population, a critical closure problem: not a “life and death” or even close to that kind of situation.) Food stamps WILL be deemed such, and most states will be unable to fund SNAP without significant changes – including constitutional violations (state constitutions). States doing so will further distance themselves from the Federal government and may take extraordinary measures, including seizure of federal funds to pay for it (unlike the situation with several states where they are PAYING the FedGov directly to reopen the parks).
So I do NOT think that they will allow the SNAP program to dry up. I think that the Utah folks are panicking unnecessarily. But panic has a way of reinforcing itself and taking on a life of its own. There are two kinds here: those dependent on SNAP who are fearful that they will have nothing to eat (or even, to trade for drugs), and those fearful of what will happen when the first group panics: the bureaucrats, the private charities, and… the law enforcement. This could lead to more calls (as from that idiot Sheila Jackson Lee) for martial law, or even some kinds of preventative measures like issuing script to supermarkets (AND convenience stores – remember those awful “Food Deserts”) and the like or even attempting to seize supplies to “protect” them against panicking rioters. Such items are high on the list of things to turn a bad situation into a nightmare that could, indeed, engulf much of the nation in a “hard” economic shutdown. A real one, not a bogus one dreamed up by the White House to bash their opposition in Congress and the streets.


Libertarian Commentary on the News, #13-40C: Lies and MORE Lies
Lies and more lies – Economics
Has Income Inequality Really Risen?
(Manhattan Institute) A variety of approaches show that inequality between the bottom and middle has not grown since the 1980s…
Nathan: That we are getting more and more unequal in our income and our life styles is one of the MANY, MANY lies that Tranzis and apologists for the state make: It is not only untrue as shown by the various methods that the Manhattan Institutes (and others) have used, but by simple observation. Whether we look back just 30 years to 1983 or 50 years to 1963, we see that virtually ALL Americans are immensely better off. Yes, there are always those who are the billionaires who have gotten richer. Just as there are ALWAYS those who homeless without even a shopping cart to put their possessions into, and who make NOTHING a day. But we will always have those with us. We will ALWAYS have greed and corruption, stinginess and lack of even basic necessities, for a very tiny percentage. Those of us who believe that government is evil and dangerous see that the slips and slides are due MORE TO government, than being balanced or offset or corrected by government, because of the very nature of government. And all too often, those who are most down and out are there because of government: laws like minimum wages and proof of residency and licensing, and events like wars (foreign and drug and poverty and terrorism) which leave damaged people on the streets and in our houses and buildings, to name just two. But that is precisely WHY Tranzis and Statists in general demand wars of aggression against those who DO succeed and wars on poverty that create MORE poverty even while they create more government jobs and more contractors dependent on government: Their power and wealth grows even faster. The Robber Barons of the 1880s and 1890s did not exist because there was too LITTLE government, but because there was already too MUCH government: government they could buy and control, government which created conditions which let the Robber Barons isolate and minimize competition and destroy the power of anyone to resist them. If we believe the Tranzis we will never see poverty go away, and the wealthy will be ever more wealthy.
Mama’s Note: Too many of the early industrialists and entrepreneurs are lumped in with these “Robber Barons.” To those who think all free markets are evil, there is no difference, but companies like the Great Northern Railway were built without government subsidies. My father worked for Great Northern in 1890, when they built the rails across the top of the country. He was a hunter, bringing in game to feed the crews, and always proud of his part in that epic endeavor.
Lies and more lies – Health care
A Look into Canadian Health Care
(The American) The average Canadian family of two parents with two children pays approximately $11,320 in taxes for hospital and physician care through the country’s tax system…
Nathan: We are told how wonderful Canada and Canadian health care is: ANOTHER Tranzi lie. Just when we are sure that we are really bad off, someone points out something like this. Of course, Canadians can claim that they don’t have to pay extravagant fees and insurance premiums – NO, they just run their money (stolen as taxes) through yet ANOTHER middleman. How stupid can you get? Nearly a thousand a month whether you have a cold in a year or NOT. Add this to VAT and all the other taxes, and Canada looks like Sweden once did.
Mama’s Note: As I tell people who complain about the cost of health care today… Just wait and see how much it costs once it is “free.”
Lies and more lies – Liberty
Free Market Falsehoods
(The Freeman) An “ideal” economic system is not one in which no one ever makes a mistake; it is one in which the mistakes that people inevitably make are corrected as effectively as possible…
Nathan: There are many ways of lying. Claiming that economic systems are supposed to be PERFECT, and that only a PERFECT economic system should be used are the kind of second-layer lies that underlie the more obvious lies that politicians, including Tranzis and Statists, love to use to build their power and wealth. We KNOW from centuries of experience that ANY economic system which involves ANY important decisions made by government agencies at ANY level is as chockful of mistakes as my wife’s fudge is of pecans and other nuts… believe me, that is a LOT of mistakes. Whether it is “national socialism” or “international socialism” (Communism) or mercantilism or a (barf!) mixed economy, government is so unaccountable to reality that it makes more and more mistakes as time goes on AND IT DOES NOT LEARN from its mistakes: there are no consequences to the people who make the decisions.
Mama’s Note: And that would be true no matter how wonderful the intentions of the politicians and bureaucrats. Unfortunately, much they do is no mistake at all, but deliberate destruction of other people’s lives and property.
Lies and more lies (Stupid people) – Politics 2013: shutdown
Shutdown: Bush’s Fault?
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan:Well yes, according to the folks (mostly black or mixed race) that were interviewed in DC, and who should know better? Of course, these are the same folks that help Jay Leno and Glenn Beck be so entertaining, who think that World War Two was between us and the Brits, that the capital of Afghanistan is Blanketville, and that Obama was born in Hawaii. Is it any wonder the Founding Fathers distrusted “democracy” so much.
Stupid government – Politics 2013: shutdown
DOD Bars 50 Priests from Administering Sacraments, Locks Up Eucharist; Priest Sues
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: This is, of course, both a contract AND a moral issue. It would seem that the DoD wants to try and get rid of ANY religious observance and was using the shutdown as an excuse. Of course, that drives those pesky religious folks out of even joining up, much less staying in. And so the morals of the force takes another nosedive.
Lies and More Lies – Culture wars: Homosexual “marriage”
Gov. Christie: Same-Sex Marriage [sic] Should Not Be Imposed By New Jersey Court
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Courts should not impose ANY kind of marriage. We are to blame: when we allow government to start defining (and redefining) words, we have (by definition – pun intended) given them too much power. Christie is fine with letting government have a LOT of power, but now he has reached his (very high) limit and is squawking. At least in public. Who knows how he might go if he gets MORE power.
This is the problem with “democracy” unless that democracy is either L. Neil Smith’s “hyperdemocracy” (that is, unanimous agreement) OR very heavily constrained within a REPUBLICAN (NOT “GOP”) constitution which very specifically prevents (AND PUNISHES) government for about 99% of the things that they want to and do perform. (And I may be low on my estimate at 99%.)
What about the lies? Supposedly 10% of the population is “homosexual” BY NATURE: Not nurture, not willful decision, but supposedly “Because God made them that way,” or (for you atheists and agnostics and “State IS God” people), “Because they EVOLVED that way.” Right. Neither mindset can come up with a way that evolution OR God would create this sort of “unchangeable” nature in humans (or any other species); genetic defects do not account for that. More accurate (and honest) studies indicate that the REAL numbers (at least until recent years) are well under 1% – and due primarily to “nurture” not nature. But the more that the culture changes the “nurture” portion of the equation, the more common the “defect” and the more the culture is changed. But the changes are built on lies, just as in Communist or other societies. Ultimately, it collapses.