[Continued from an earlier article by Nathan Barton]
The four lowest states are relatively conservative (if not necessarily in national politics) and all in the west – other than that, they have little in common. North Dakota is incredibly wealthy (relatively) with the Bakken etc. oil and gas boom, and very low unemployment. It and Wyoming are very small (in population) and have traditions of self-sufficiency and community help. Nebraska is relatively well-off, doing better than Wyoming economically but with two large urban areas. Colorado, frankly, surprises me: the state is a mess, with a bad (and probably again worsening economy), bad liberal government, and major urban areas and smaller urban areas with a huge underclass.
Although Montana and South Dakota are in the second tier (10-15% food stamps), they are very similar to ND, MT, WY, and NE. BUT they have a large AmerInd population, both on and off the Rez, and the economic straits of the tribes as well as their treaty rights mean that the great majority of them are on SNAP. Since 10-12% of SD’s population is enrolled members, this alone counts for the participation. (Colorado has tribes but such a small percentage that they are literally a drop in the bucket, even with urban AmerInd population.)
Also in that second tier are three states in which the participation has DOUBLED since 2008 – just five years. Idaho, Utah, and Nevada have many problems: Nevada in particular has been very hard hit by the Crash of 2009 – this depression in all but name. Its tourism/gaming industry was attacked by both its unions, its federal legislators, and the White House: it is actually a surprise to see it isn’t higher. Utah and Idaho have shifted population, with far more non-LDS (and thus not using the excellent Bishop’s system available to LDS in dire straits). They have also been hit by changes in government programs and regulations: timber, mining, and other fundamental industries have been in bad shape.
Now to the other end:
Why on earth is there a 20-25% rate in Oregon of all places? Oregon is socialist (as well as anti-military) but not much more than Michigan or Wisconsin. It wasn’t the Crash that drove this up by a huge amount of participants. Perhaps Oregonians are more susceptible to government advertising (propaganda) about food stamps and other programs. Perhaps the attacks by government on the timber industry and many other industries has dragged it down. Oregon is NOT business friendly, I’m told, so maybe small businesses have been hurt more.
It is easier to understand why New Mexico is so bad off: large AmerInd population (remember treaty rights and such) – especially the Navajo and various Pueblo, lots of immigrants, especially illegal ones, in New Mexico, perhaps because the culture is more similar to Latin America than any other state. It has been damaged by liberal administrations and legislatures and urban governments (Albuquerque and Santa Fe in particular), and hit by government control and by government reductions in military and research matters. But still, like Oregon, there must be other reasons.
Tennessee, Mississippi, and Louisiana may be so high because they are part of the Old South and the Black Belt; as well as having entrenched Democratic municipal governments and many endemic economic problems. (Louisiana’s condition is obviously Bush’s fault since he caused Katrina and all but destroyed New Orleans.) The last one in this fourth, bottom tier is Rhode Island, with strong liberal control at all levels, an economy that hasn’t recovered from not being bombed during WW1 and WW2, and massive immigration. It has doubled in five years, again perhaps because with almost no industry left, even the parasites have started moving away.
I am surprised to find DC in this tier (I don’t count it because it isn’t a state – except for a state of mental distress), but maybe if you take away all the government parasites with incomes of over $50,000 a year (that is, those who supposedly WORK for government, not those who are officially on welfare), it would be way over 25% on food stamps. Of course, a GS-1 (there are, apparently, a few of those left) gets more than $20/hour, but only about $22K a year: possible to be eligible for food stamps in a one-earner family. But face it, DC has an entitlement mentality and has since the War between the States: gimme gimme from the guy squatting at 1600 PA right now to the most derelict bum sleeping on a street grate.
Florida’s doubling in five years can probably be attributed to the massive retired population, massive immigration (internal and external), and cuts in government – as well as the real estate crash. Even so, it is still better off than the worst five states and DC. Notice that except for Rhode Island, NONE of the 20-25% states doubled: which must mean that there are so many already on the public teat that is is hard to get that much of an increase.
There are 47 million of us on the OFFICIAL, federal dole. That is basically one in six of us; 16%. Of course, the numbers vary significantly from place to place, indeed in the measure of a few blocks. And with the Crash, even from house to house. The fact that there are such differences on a state-by-state level is an indication that it is NOT simply economic conditions or social status. There MUST be other factors. But I don’t have the data to figure out what they are.
So, you say to me, “Nathan, all this description is no doubt fascinating, but it doesn’t mean that food stamps are evil. So why do you call them that?” Obviously, people need them or think they need them. That chart shows that food stamps don’t even pay enough for an average man to eat: about fifty bucks short on a monthly basis.
Here is why: See part 3 tomorrow.

Libertarian Commentary on the News, #13-40B: Minor matters
Nathan: Compared to the cave by the Congress, all this other stuff (for now) is minor stuff not to be worried much about. Or is it?
Home Front – Tyranny on an Integrated Scale
Federal Healthcare Law Used to Take Camera from Man Recording Local Police
(The Blaze) To summarize: a man was charged with crimes for videotaping a police officer making an arrest; the police officer claimed that the arrest was a “mental health check” because the person being arrested was having a mental breakdown. Therefore, the man filming the incident was violating the privacy of the man being arrested, which is (according to the cop and his bosses) a violation of HIPAA, the federal law on health insurance privacy protection.
Nathan: If I get this right, if you do something that causes you to be arrested, even if you are not later charged with anything, the action that led to your arrest is proof that you are having a deterioration in your mental health. Therefore, all records regarding this “health evaluation” (arrest) are prevented from being released to protect your “HIPAA rights” – and no one (not even a “real” reporter) can record any part of the process or anything related to that “health and welfare check.” Anyone attempting to do so will be arrested and charged with violating federal law. Apparently this is one federal law (unlike illegally crossing the border or stealing someone’s identity to get a job as an illegal) that local police CAN enforce. Your arrest (if you are arrested for video recording) is also not just an arrest, but a mental health evaluation process: you are under observation have been “confined” for a mental health problem. That means, that you now have a history of mental health problems which makes you ineligible to buy or own firearms, and for anyone in your house to have firearms. (If they fail to remove firearms because you are present, they too are subject to arrest and a concurrent “mental health evaluation” for disobeying the law, and the cycle continues.) You also of course are subject to all curtailment of rights and liberties because of your mental health condition, even if you are subsequently released and not charged with anything. If any of this occurred within the vicinity of a child (the definition of “vicinity” being very elastic, of course), you could further be identified (even without benefit of trial or even a hearing) as a child abuser and a future threat to all children, even your own. This of course is reason to remove the children from your home, and could require that you move to someplace suitably distant from any school, church building, playground, park, or athletic field, even a college campus. If any of this arrest and further arrest and all had ANYTHING at all to do with sex: for example, if you lost your temper and used the f-word, or if you grabbed your groin after being kicked between the legs by a cop, you could further be identified as a “sex offender” and required to register as such. You would, of course, lose more and more rights, until you are nothing but another cog in the great national prison and “justice” government-industrial system.
Mama’s Note: Thank goodness there are not enough cops to do this very often, though once is too much, of course. The best thing I can think of to prevent this is to stay out of the cities where these psycho cops run around loose… They can’t be everywhere. And if you do decide to video something, have a camera too small to detect, and don’t call any attention to yourself in the process. Have some way to upload the video instantly too, then the cops can’t destroy it and say it never happened.
Europe’s Collapse – Border Jumpers
EU Ratchets Up Border Security
(PressEurop) “The EU is building up a team of heavily-guarded men to help Libya stop unwanted migrants and to collect intelligence,” reveals news websiteEUobserver days after at least 34 migrants drowned after reportedly setting sail to Europe from Libya. Meanwhile, in a separate story, EUobserver also announces that EU border security agency Frontex is considering using aerial drones, which can be operated remotely or with a pilot, to monitor frontiers.
Nathan: Learning a lesson from Big Brother (the US), I guess. Cooperating and sending “police” into Libya, using drones, setting up spy networks, and meanwhile, watching people die. Of course, this being the EU, the “border security” will make even the Mexican Border in the US look like it is airtight (and being run by professionals). No doubt the EU has decided that something has to be done, because it is clear that they can no longer rely on the US to be either the man on a white horse OR the big bad boogeyman to keep the riffraff away. But we have MORE from Europe:
Europe’s Collapse – Slavery
880,000 slaves in the European Union TODAY
(PressEurop) According to the latest figures from the European parliament’s [Organised Crime, Corruption and Money Laundering Committee(CRIM), approximately 880,000 people in the European Union are living in slavery.
They notably include “children that are forced to beg, men who are forced to work for pitifully low wages, and women who are forced to work as prostitutes,” explains De Morgen. The daily adds that CRIM has called on member states to apply the EU’s directive on human trafficking, and demanded that the European Commission implement its strategy for the eradication of trafficking in human beings.
Nathan: These are, of course, the 100 percent slaves, not the 40 or 50% slaves who are called “taxpayers” by governments, but whom are slaving for their “betters” by being forced to give significant parts of their income to the State. When you add THOSE numbers, just as here in the US, MOST of the population is living in slavery. What is worse, most of those who are do NOT CARE – they are “secure” and therefore willing to accept their chains.
Islamic wars
Malaysia: Court restricts use of “Allah” to Muslims
(The Hindu [India]) “A Malaysian appeals court ruled on Monday that only Muslims can use the word ‘Allah’ to refer to god, upholding a government ban on the word being used in a Catholic publication. The ruling reverses an earlier lower court decision. … On December 31, 2009, the Kuala Lumpur High Court lifted the prohibition, noting that the church had a constitutional right to use the word in its publication on the ground that religions other than Islam can be practiced in peace and harmony.” (10/14/13)
Nathan: This adds fuel to those that accuse the Muslims of worshiping a moon god or some such, but also shows that even so-called “secular” governments in predominantly Muslim countries are anything but. And it warns us of what is to come as the US declines more rapidly. The writer of The Last Centurion may still see his predictions come true.