By Nathan Barton
According to Claire Bernish over at The Free Thought Project, Monday the 1st of May was declared “Loyalty Day” by Hated Leader The Donald Trump – apparently (so Claire says in her headline) to “Remind Americans to Never Question Government.” Supposedly “obedient citizens” were supposed to fly the Stars and Stripes to attest to this.
Except, of course, he didn’t say that, and that isn’t what loyalty is all about, anyway. (As she herself at least hints out in the text). It is not new – been around since 1958, created by Congress to counter the Communist/Socialist celebration of May Day as “International Worker Solidarity Day” (and variations on a theme).
I don’t blame her – it is a great hook to hang yet another whinging (if often accurate) litany of the evils of the The Donald and the entire Fifty States (not just the FedGov or just government). And I realize that it gets boring (and therefore ignored) to just repeat the same old complaints about the wickedness of the current occupant of the White House, especially after the first 100 days of “power.” Continue reading
When is enough enough? Local government and its role
By Nathan Barton
A correspondent shared an article from the Tampa Bay (Florida) Times about a bill in Florida that would raise the “homestead exemption” for property taxes to $75,000. That is a scheme by which the first $75,000 appraised value of a house is not subject to property taxes. It is a way (theoretically, at least) to protect poorer homeowners from losing their homes due to heavy property tax burdens. Since taxes for education are not going to be subject to the exemption, the average Floridian homeowner will see their property tax reduced by $275 per year, starting in 2019, if the voters ratify the legislature’s action.
The article concentrated on an estimate that this would take $619 million dollars in revenue away from local (county and city and special district) governments in Florida. The argument is that other taxes would have to be raised to replace this money so that these governments could continue to provide services.
Of course all these services are “essential” and therefore the money “must” be replaced lest Floridians lack what they need to be provided by government.
Essential? By whose definition? Provided by government? Why? Continue reading →