Nazgul and Culture Wars: homosexual “marriage”
Supreme Court Ruling To Make Big Impact
(Political Outcast) Homosexuals across the land are celebrating in force as the US Supreme Court voted 5-4 to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, thus opening the door to nationwide same-sex marriage. In the Court’s ruling, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote:
“DOMA’s principal effect is to identify and make unequal a subset of state-sanctioned marriages. It contrives to deprive some couples married under the laws of their state, but not others, of both rights and responsibilities, creating two contradictory marriage regimes within the same state. It also forces same-sex couples to live as married for the purpose of state law but unmarried for the purpose of federal law, thus diminishing the stability and predictability of basic personal relations the state has found it proper to acknowledge and protect.”
Justice Antonin Scalia disagreed with the ruling and in his dissent wrote:
“We have no power to decide this case. And even if we did, we have no power under the constitution to invalidate this democratically adopted legislation. The court’s errors on both points spring forth from the same diseased root: an exalted conception of the role of this institution in America.” [Emphasis NAB]
Chief Justice John Roberts also disagreed with the court’s decision and wrote in his dissention:
“I think it … important to point out that its analysis leads no further. The court does not have before it, and the logic of its opinion does not decide, the distinct question whether the states, in the exercise of their ‘historic and essential authority to define the marital relation,’ … may continue to utilize the traditional definition of marriage.”
Nathan: There is a LOT to be said about this, but the first thing I want to point out is that these Nazgul Nine have demonstrated time and time again that they are no lovers or supporters of liberty. For people to claim this as a victory for libertarian principles is foolish and wrong. Principles of liberty are clear: government has NO authority to decide the legitimacy of homosexual marriage any more than it has to decide the legitimacy of traditional marriage.
At the same time, those who claim (as does the writer of the above article, which goes on to predict disaster) that this decision has or is destroying America need to wake up and smell the napalm: the Republic is DEAD and has been for a long time: at best, things like this are just ensuring that every single cell and organism in the rotting corpse is also dead. American immorality runs rampant, but it can’t kill what no longer exists: American society and liberty and a republican form of government.
Kennedy supposedly went with and wrote the majority opinion in an attempt to moderate the ruling: I find that hard to believe. At the same time, in a narrow way, he makes sense: the law creates conflicts in states and nationally that are not in accordance with the Constitution. As if that still mattered, frankly. Of course DOMA was flawed: Congress is incapable of passing an unflawed law. Totally incapable. The idea that the obligation of one state to recognize the actions of another state in a situation like this (definition of a basic human institution) is stupid and dangerous. If one state (say, New Jersey) redefines rat poison as milk and therefore suited for human consumption, is Colorado or South Dakota obligated to allow the poison to be imported and sold as milk? Of course not. If a New Yorker is wanted for putting 15 rounds in a 15-round magazine by the State of New York, is South Dakota going to “recognize” the legitimacy of the New York law by extraditing the supposed felon? You better believe that they won’t. (Not yet, at least. Colorado will, starting on Monday – at least the General Assembly and the Governor and Attorney General will – the majority of the counties might not.)
Roberts also made some sense with his dissent, but he should have been more blunt. Marriage was not created nor defined by government, local, state or federal – or indeed by any human institution, including the Catholic Church or any other denomination or organization. The States stole their “authority” to define marriage, and now the FedGov tried to steal it from the States. He should have demanded that ALL federal laws regarding marriage were unconstitutional, because NO ONE gave the FedGov that authority.
But I feel the most sympathy with Scalia and his very VERY angry condemnation of the majority decision. The Nazgul, as a GROUP – a gang of nine, have exceeded the hubris of even such people as King Saul and King George III. “Too high an opinion” indeed.
Some commentators have pointed out a number of possibilities. First, what does this open the window to? Polygamy, certainly – indeed polyamory in any combination, whether Muslim one man and four women or old LDS-style one man and one to a dozen+ women/girls or the feminists’ dream of a dozen men and one woman, or the equivalent of a pick-up team for football… And yes, there is a possibility that age restrictions and the end of statutory rape is not too far down the path, as well as the various forms of bestiality and necrophilia and who knows what else. But don’t expect the laws to be disappeared: that is too simple and too likely to provoke a backlash: it is just enforcement that will go away.
And that is the thing I note of particular interest. The Nazgul have, intentionally or not, presented another grave disservice to the suffering people of this nation. By declaring even a part of DOMA unconstitutional (you know that the general public will consider ALL of it to have been voided), they have given a free pass to that swarmy black-face, would-be Himmler minion of the guy who hangs out in 1600. He (obviously with the support of his massa and his massa’s massas) on his own decided to stop enforcing DOMA years before this decision. I suspect that he will simply broaden his activities of refusing to enforce more and more laws.
Never mind the gunrunning, never mind the voter fraud and intimidation and other voter rights (the one part he DID enforce was the part ruled unconstitutional as well, this week). never mind the NSA and IRS and DOJ violations of laws: ANY law that is in someone’s way – as long as that ‘someone’ has any clout or can pay enough – will be enforced or ignored at will. It will appear to be whimsical, but it will not be: it will be done based on some very simple criteria: (a) is it good for me? (b) is it good for my family? (c) is it good for my patrons or buddies? (d) is it good for my clientèle (in the Roman sense)? Don’t worry, religious or traditional American morality won’t play any role in the decision, and now we are definitely back to Caligula and Nero – not just tyranny, but cruel and vindictive tyranny.
We were warned – shucks, we have been warning people a lot. And we just slide farther and farther into the abyss. Government should have NOTHING to do with marriage, but that isn’t going to happen with this government: I cannot see any circumstance except total overthrow of this ersatz regime that would end that interference. Until then, this (like government meddling with divorce and parental responsibility before it) will just speed up the already rapid decay of society, “civilization,” and liberty – while pretending to “liberate” us. Shades of Iraq and Afghanistan, eh?
Libertarian Commentary on the News, #13-25B: Border jumpers and Congress
Congress in action – Border jumpers
Corker: If Bill Says ‘Immigration Reform,’ Some Senators ‘Won’t Support It’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Don’t you think that is better than supporting every bill that crosses their desk?
Mama’s Note: Indeed… Doing nothing, gridlock, cross purposes, big hairy fights on the house and senate floor, shutting the whole thing down and forgetting about it… any of those will work for me.
New Religions: Environism and Global Warming
Gore: ‘Energy Release’ Equal to ‘400,000 Hiroshima Atomic Bombs Going Off’ Every Day
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Whew! Good thing someone turns that thing off every night, huh? Or does it REALLY go around to the other side of the planet? Of course, we all know that the earth and the sun and everything else revolves around His Green Highness Algor…
Mama’s Note: Good grief. How does someone that stupid manage to draw the next breath?
Stupid Congress tricks – Border Jumpers
Feinstein: ‘I Can’t Remember How Many DUIs Somebody Can Have’ and Still Be Legalized Under Immigration Bill
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Sounds like she’s had a few too many DUIs to be legalized herself. We now send people to prison for as few as three – and just ONE if someone is killed or injured as a result, so of COURSE we want to give a free pass, as the next story relates.
Stupid Congress tricks – Border Jumpers
Senate Bill Will Legalize Illegal Aliens Who Have 2 DUIs
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: This is no different than the passports. I could lose my engineer’s license for even ONE DUI, and certainly counterfeiting just ONE passport (or any other government paper) would land me in jail AND disbarred. Unless I can change my name and get an accent!
Mama’s Note: What a silly thing to hinge it on anyway. One would assume that a record of armed robbery or assault, etc. would be much more important.
Stupid government – Islamic wars: Afghan front
Air Force Secretary Touts ‘Gay Pride’ Events in Afghanistan Where Homosexuality is Illegal
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: The cultural blindness of so many of our “public servants” – regardless of their sexual orientation – is very difficult to comprehend. But this is NOT unusual: consider that the US routinely denies federal aid and “humanitarian” and military assistance to countries that refuse to abide by US standards (as the Tranzis define them) for things like abortion and “gay” rights and such – EXCEPT for these Muslim countries. Notwithstanding, this minion of the “messiah” is likely going to encourage a good number of fundamental-radical-Islamofascists to go get themselves some “gays.” It is a twofer, after all: both a ferengi AND a homo all in a nice camo uniform!
Stupid government – New religions: environism – Lies and more lies
Obama: No Keystone (XL) Pipeline If It Increases Carbon Emissions
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: There you almost certainly have the bell toiling for the entire project. Who cares about a few million people in the Upper Great Plains, or a few trillion dollars in savings: and never mind that the Earth’s temperature hasn’t gone up by a single measurable one-tenth degree Celsius in 15 years while carbon emissions have (outside the US, naturally). We HAVE to cut carbon emissions to “save the planet” for the Tranzis.
Mama’s Note: And, of course, never mind that “carbon emissions” have nothing to do with climate change, real or imagined. Just another excuse for control and the destruction of the economy.
Congress in action – Lies and more lies
Rep. Moore: GOP Demands ‘That You Work Else Your Children Can’t Eat’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: What planet is HE from? That hasn’t been the case for 99% of Americans for a VERY long time – they may not get all the great food, but…
The “messiah” – Lies and more lies
Irish Parliamentarian: Is Obama ‘Going for the Hypocrite of the Century Award?’
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Well, he already has five “Hypocrite of the Year” awards, so…
The “messiah’s” minions – Islamic wars: Arab street revolt
Kerry: No Saudis Fighting in Syria
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: My, the man is amazing: he and his staff personally quizzed every combatant in Syria to determine that there are none! Or does he mean there is no one of the House of Saud, that tribe-mob-plutocracy that Saudi Arabia is named for?
Mama’s Note: Or… he just asked the Saudi king about it and he said no, so that settles it. Personally, I don’t really care. They can all kill each other if they wish. The US taxpayer shouldn’t be getting the bill for it, that’s all.
The “messiah’s” minions – Politics 2013
Holder: SCOTUS Decision on Voting Rights Could Negatively Affect Millions
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Indeed, millions of parasites and scam-artist politicos and other lowlife types. And a few innocent folks here and there, I’m sure. But this decision is too little, too late: the American electorate has been reduced to a mob long ago, and the Voting Rights Act was a major part of it: the states reduced to mere agents for an ever more powerful government, using this law for nearly 50 years to gain more power.
Congress in action – Border jumpers
Bill: Only Someone Who ‘Counterfeits, Alters or Falsely Makes 3 or More Passports’ Has Committed Crime
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Funny, funny. You ever read all the fine print on ANY government form you have to fill out and sign? Ain’t no “three strikes and THEN you are out” on those for American citizens or for HONEST people who have immigrated to this land. Only the border jumpers…
World wars
US Taxpayers Fund UN Human Rights Council Activities Which the US Opposes
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: Which SOME people in the US oppose. Obviously NOT a majority (or at least not a majority with GUTS) in the Congress, or the people who vote for them time and time again. This is, certainly, NOT the only or by any means the most important action the US is doing that a great many people find acceptable. But you can be sure that the squatter in 1600 PA doesn’t care.
World wars
BBC Poll: World’s Opinion of U.S. Lowest Since Bush Presidency
(CNSNews.com)
Nathan: My oh my, isn’t that sad. I don’t think we should really care, because what the rest of the world thinks about the present squatter in 1600 PA isn’t really of great importance. As long as there is a majority in the House and the Senate who refuse to charge, try and convict him of the evil crimes against liberty and humanity he and those working for him have committed, the US and the world will continue to plunge downward.
Quote of the Week
Day by day, brick by brick, we are losing our country. It’s demise looks inevitable.
– Matt Allen
Mama’s Note: I guess that depends on what you call your “country.” If that is the constitution and the “republican” form of government, I would agree. But my COUNTRY isn’t the same thing as any government. Instead, I think the inevitable demise of the government presents the ultimate opportunity for individual sovereignty and a truly free market to develop.