By MamaLiberty
Some recent comments on various message boards frequented by shooters indicate that a few people are either changing their minds or are bowing to the politically correct pressure of the day. They have begun to assert that they do NOT “love their guns” and only view them as necessary tools.
While I couldn’t agree more that guns are simply tools, pretty much like any others, I don’t know why that would make them unlovable. Most men love their tools, all different kinds, and men have always loved their guns. I’m certainly not ashamed to join those men.
But, you might ask, just what is it that we (who still profess it anyway) actually love about guns? Aren’t they killing machines, good only for harming others? We hear that a lot.
So, why do I love my guns? Let me count the ways.
To start with, about 30 years ago I was attacked and would likely have died if I had not been armed.
At that point the man started to walk toward me, in a few words telling me just how he would hurt me. I raised the shotgun, but he just sneered and said confidently, “you won’t shoot me” and kept coming.
He was still too close to my car, so I aimed the .410 shotgun just over his head and pulled the trigger.
I saw the shocked look, just before I saw the blood on his face and chest where the tiny #6 birdshot had hit him. He turned and ran away, destroying a low ornamental fence in the process, but never even slowing to untangle it from his legs.
How would the world be better and more peaceful if I had been raped and murdered instead, simply because I had no gun?
I love to take my guns apart and clean them, usually after a satisfying day at the range or out on the wide grasslands. I love their mechanical simplicity and elegance, the engineering miracle that really has not changed much for hundreds of years. I love the smell of the cleaning products and the silky sound of the action when it is oiled properly. The crisp “snap” of the trigger release is music to my ears.
Though I protect my hearing religiously, I love the sound of gunfire on the range when I’m there, and in the distance as others shoot. I’m about a mile from the range and can hear it often. It is the sound of freedom to me – other men and women both enjoying themselves and practicing a useful skill.
I have an old M1 .30 carbine. The scratches and dents in the old wooden stock have a serious story to tell… though sadly I can’t read it and the man who could is probably long gone by now. I love to shoot that gun, and imagine the story it might tell if it could. It’s a good old gun, and would certainly help me to defend myself and my neighbors if necessary.
My old Marlin 30-30 lever gun is just about perfect for hunting, which could keep me alive if things ever got to that point. That might mean bringing down deer for food, or holding off predators who would take my food away from me. The scarred old stock has another and just as beautiful tale to tell, of hunts and shooting matches and the companionship that both can bring to all kinds of people.
The Springfield XD 9mm I carry on my belt each day, everywhere I go, is part of the ongoing story of my life. I’m 67 years old, and not able to run or fight meaningfully with my bare hands. The tool in that holster gives me the power to overcome my physical shortcomings and equalizes my opportunity to save myself or others from aggression and great harm or death. That is a heavy responsibility and one that most armed people take very seriously.
A Ruger .357 magnum revolver is my back up and concealed carry gun. I carried it openly for years, but found I had better control of the semi-automatic. Concealed carry is good for certain situations, but I’m glad that it’s not necessary all the time.
The most important reason I love my guns is something quite different, however.
They represent self ownership, and true independence. They mark me as one who is responsible for myself and willing to risk everything to protect myself and others. It also marks me as a free human being and not a slave. Slaves are not “allowed” to own and carry guns. Free people can’t be stopped from doing so.
I love my guns, and the liberty for which they stand.
******
*NRA Certified instructor and other certification for handguns, self defense. Thirty years teaching and shooting experience.
“I Am Not A Victim” is available as an e-book free. Read the story at the link and follow the directions to get your pdf copy by return email.
Libertarian Commentary on the News, #13-46D
Theft by government – Morals in government
State Department Spent $140,000 On Booze For Foreign Leaders As Government Planned To Kick U.S. Vets Out Of Memorials Because Of Shutdown
(Personal Liberty News) As Federal officials shrieked endlessly about the dire effect the government shutdown would have on the American public, the State Department was busy racking up a massive bar tab stocking up on liquor for embassies around the word.
Nathan: I am sure that the priority for keeping the vets OUT of the memorials was higher than for this booze: the “deny access” operation had to cost a lot more than $140K. And it sent a message to everyone that they will remember next week: don’t mess with us or we’ll treat you even MORE like dirt. This administration IS good at some things… Just all the wrong things. Just like government: it isn’t ALL incompetent and stupid: many parts are very good at things like stealing money, killing people, and destroying the economy. Besides, we know the liquor was consumed in a good cause: the same scenario as the Lothario plying the girl at the bar with lots of drinks.
Home front – Stupid cop- Government-ruined, Theft-funded Schools
Cops Arrest Kids For Following Coach’s Orders To Wait At Bus Stop
(Personal Liberty News) After police in Rochester, New York threatened to arrest three Edison Tech High School athletes who were dutifully waiting for a bus their coach had scheduled for them, the kids didn’t know where to turn. They knew the bus was coming, but they had police telling them their presence at a public bus stop was obstructing the flow of pedestrian traffic while they waited.
Nathan: My oh my: the authorities are in conflict with each other, and guess who gets ground to powder? Of course, it is a good thing one of them didn’t reach for his cell phone in his pocket, and have the cops gun them all down. What was the coach thinking?
Does Video Surveillance Of A Home For A Month Violate The 4th Amendment
(Personal Liberty News) As police departments around the country get their hands on new technologies like drones and mesh networks, the ability to move around anonymously and privately will be significantly impaired. The Electronic Frontier Foundation argues that it is crucial for courts to play a role in policing the police and their new toys by overseeing the use of these technologies.
Nathan: The Founding Fathers did not SPECIFICALLY prohibit (or authorize!) government agents keeping someone under surveillance at their home or place of business or worship, although spies had long been used by government. What they DID do is prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,…” The REASON for these prohibitions is what is important: “our right to be secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects…” Does 24/7 surveillance using electronic means which also can penetrate more than the human eye and ear constitute a violation of this right? I think so. So does EFF. BUT will the courts bother to do anything to protect this liberty? Don’t bother to answer, we already know.
Mama’s Note: Unfortunately, the definition of the word “unreasonable” is unclear in the constitution, and the government has always interpreted it to suit themselves… as with everything else. And it will continue as long as most people accept the government definition of “reasonable.”
The “messiah’s” minions – Politics 2016
Obama: Biden among the best VPs ever, Clinton among best secretaries
(Washington Post) President Obama declinedThursday to take sides in the potential battle for his successor as president, instead saying that both Vice President Biden and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton will rank among the greatest to ever hold those jobs.
Nathan: If we are going to accept hyperbole like this in our public discourse, let me add to it: These two were about the worst senators in history since Caligula appointed his horse Incitatus to the Senate. As for the VP: well, once more it has been shown what an empty worthless job that is, and how virtually anyone still breathing can serve as VP. As for Secretary of State, where to begin? Benghazi? Syria? China? Of course, Kerry DOES make Clinton look really good at the job. But who in the Democratic Party is even worth considering? Really?
Mama’s Note: I was very lucky not to have a mouth full of coffee when I read that. Just about choked anyway. But of course it all depends on your definition of “best.” For Obummer’s purposes, I suspect they are just fine.