By MamaLiberty
The role of the non-voluntary government, all of the insane rules and regulations that impede and destroy business, is well known. The cost of these job destroying regulations probably exceeds that of the taxes, fees, licenses and outright bribes disguised as “fines.” Together they are strangling the economy of the entire world and unemployment is a serious problem.
The “minimum wage,” affirmative action, racial quotas and the like are well known, though seriously misunderstood by so many, and the whole insanity of confusing the incestuous relationship between government and big business with the free market is disputed everywhere. The entire fabric of business and the market is being roiled by changes and stresses our ancestors never could have imagined. Continue reading
Libertarian Commentary on the News, 24 August 2015, #15-34A: Fearmongering
By Nathan Barton
Fearmongering or a victory for vaping? Even while some government agencies and studies, like the Student Science News claims that vaping leads to increased rates of smoking for teens, the Adam Smith Institute reports that Public Health England “concludes there is no evidence that e-cigarettes are a gateway to lead children or non-smokers into smoking. On the contrary, they find that almost all of the 2.6 million vapers in Britain are current or ex-smokers using e-cigarettes to help them quit or to keep them from reverting. They found that increasing numbers, now nearly half the population, believe that vaping is as harmful or more harmful than are cigarettes, even though it is estimated to be only up to 5% as harmful. This could be because the anti-vapers trying to have it banned indoors or in public places have persuaded them that it is harmful.” Time Magazine chimes in, claiming that vaping is 95% more healthy and 40% cheaper than tobacco cigarettes, saving ex-smokers $1200 per year (and twice that in New York City, no doubt). Is this just a difference between Her Majesty’s subjects and “free” American teens? Or is the Student Society for Science just publishing propaganda garbage? Continue reading →